Background: Healthy lifestyle interventions have a positive impact on multiple disease trajectories, including cancer-related outcomes. Specifically, appropriate habitual physical activity, adequate sleep, and a regular wholesome diet are of paramount importance for the wellness and supportive care of survivors of cancer. Mobile health (mHealth) apps have the potential to support novel tailored lifestyle interventions.

Objective: This observational pilot study aims to assess the feasibility of mHealth multidimensional longitudinal monitoring in survivors of cancer. The primary objective is to test the compliance (user engagement) with the monitoring solution. Secondary objectives include recording clinically relevant subjective and objective measures collected through the digital solution.

Methods: This is a monocentric pilot study taking place in Bangor, Wales, United Kingdom. We plan to enroll up to 100 adult survivors of cancer not receiving toxic anticancer treatment, who will provide self-reported behavioral data recorded via a dedicated app and validated questionnaires and objective data automatically collected by a paired smartwatch over 16 weeks. The participants will continue with their normal routine surveillance care for their cancer. The primary end point is feasibility (eg, mHealth monitoring acceptability). Composite secondary end points include clinically relevant patient-reported outcome measures (eg, the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System score) and objective physiological measures (eg, step counts). This trial received a favorable ethical review in May 2023 (Integrated Research Application System 301068).

Results: This study is part of an array of pilots within a European Union funded project, entitled "GATEKEEPER," conducted at different sites across Europe and covering various chronic diseases. Study accrual is anticipated to commence in January 2024 and continue until June 2024. It is hypothesized that mHealth monitoring will be feasible in survivors of cancer; specifically, at least 50% (50/100) of the participants will engage with the app at least once a week in 8 of the 16 study weeks.

Conclusions: In a population with potentially complex clinical needs, this pilot study will test the feasibility of multidimensional remote monitoring of patient-reported outcomes and physiological parameters. Satisfactory compliance with the use of the app and smartwatch, whether confirmed or infirmed through this study, will be propaedeutic to the development of innovative mHealth interventions in survivors of cancer.

International Registered Report Identifier (irrid): PRR1-10.2196/52957.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11094600PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/52957DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

survivors cancer
20
pilot study
12
remote monitoring
8
study
8
feasibility mhealth
8
cancer primary
8
clinically relevant
8
participants will
8
mhealth monitoring
8
study will
8

Similar Publications

Objective: To evaluate the process of an online cognitive rehabilitation program aimed at supporting cancer survivors experiencing cognitive problems at work.

Methods: Cancer survivors (n = 279) were randomized to one of the intervention groups (i.e.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Importance: Data characterizing the severity and changing prevalence of bone mineral density (BMD) deficits and associated nonfracture consequences among childhood cancer survivors decades after treatment are lacking.

Objective: To evaluate risk for moderate and severe BMD deficits in survivors and to identify long-term consequences of BMD deficits.

Design, Setting, And Participants: This cohort study used cross-sectional and longitudinal data from the St Jude Lifetime (SJLIFE) cohort, a retrospectively constructed cohort with prospective follow-up.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Reconfiguring Priorities: Breastfeeding Decision-making Among Young Breast Cancer Survivors.

Cancer Nurs

January 2025

Author Affiliations: Department Research, Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Universitat Autonòma de Barcelona; and NURECARE Research Group, Institut d'Investigació i Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol (IGTP), Ctra de Can Ruti, Camí de les Escoles (Dr Huertas-Zurriaga); Department Research, Institut Català Oncologia-Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol; Universitat Autonòma de Barcelona; GRIN Group, IDIBELL, Institute of Biomedical Research; and NURECARE Research Group, IGTP, Ctra de Can Ruti, Camí de les Escoles (Dr Cabrera-Jaime); Tecnocampus University and NURECARE Research Group, IGTP, Ctra de Can Ruti, Camí de les Escoles (Dr Navarri); Oncology Department, Hereditarian Cancer Program, Institut Català Oncologia-Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, B-ARGO (Badalona Applied Research Group in Oncology), IGTP (Health Research Institute Germans Trias i Pujol), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (Dr Teruel-Garcia); and Nursing Research Group in Vulnerability and Health (GRIVIS); and Nursing Department, Faculty of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (Dr Leyva-Moral), Badalona, Spain.

Article Synopsis
  • Breast cancer survivors experience unique challenges when making decisions about breastfeeding, with limited research on their experiences.
  • The study revealed that young women often prioritize other aspects of their cancer journey over breastfeeding, influenced by factors like the effects of treatment and support gaps from healthcare providers.
  • To improve care, it's crucial for healthcare professionals to address breastfeeding in oncological discussions, involve lactation consultants familiar with oncology, and create peer support programs that empower survivors.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: It is not known whether temporal changes in childhood cancer therapy have reduced risk of subsequent malignant neoplasms (SMNs) of the central nervous system (CNS), a frequently fatal late effect of cancer therapy.

Methods: Five-year survivors of primary childhood cancers diagnosed between 1970-1999 in the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study with a subsequent CNS SMN were identified. Cumulative incidence rates and standardized incidence ratios (SIR) were compared among survivors diagnosed between 1970-1979 (N = 6223), 1980-1989 (N = 9680), and 1990-1999 (N = 8999).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!