Objective To analyze the diagnostic values of HFPEF and HFA-PEFF scores for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and HFpEF complicated with atrial fibrillation (HFpEF-AF) in Chinese patients and explore the related factors. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted.A total of 835 consecutive HFpEF patients treated in the Department of Geriatric Cardiology,the First Hospital of Lanzhou University from 2009 to 2020 were selected and assigned to a HFpEF-AF group (=267) and a HFpEF group (=568) according to the presence of AF or not.HFA-PEFF and HFPEF scores were used for retrospective diagnosis and the diagnostic consistency of the two scores was assessed.One hundred and thirty-six healthy volunteers with age and sex matching the patients during the same period were selected as healthy controls.The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were established for HFPEF and HFA-PEFF scores in diagnosing HFpEF-AF and HFpEF,on the basis of which the diagnostic performance of the two scores was evaluated. Results There was no difference in the HFA-PEFF score between the two groups (=0.070).However,the HFpEF-AF group had higher mean HFPEF score and higher proportion of patients with the score no less than 6 than the HFpEF group (<0.001).According to the ROC curves,HFA-PEFF and HFPEF scores demonstrated high performance in diagnosing all HFpEF patients,with the area under the curve (AUC) of 0.892 and 0.922 and the optimal cut-offs of 4 and 4,respectively.The HFA-PEFF score showed similar performance in diagnosing HFpEF and HFpEF-AF,with the AUC of 0.899 and 0.911,respectively.The HFPEF score had higher performance in diagnosing HFpEF-AF (AUC of approximately 1.000) and low performance in diagnosing HFpEF (AUC of 0.885). Conclusions The HFA-PEFF score is applicable in the diagnosis of both HFpEF and HFpEF-AF.The HFPEF score may underestimate HFpEF in Chinese patients,and its applicability in the Chinese patients with HFpEF alone remains to be investigated.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.3881/j.issn.1000-503X.15826 | DOI Listing |
Echocardiography
November 2024
Department of Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Background: The study aimed to evaluate the changes of left ventricular diastolic function and the improvement of clinical symptoms in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) after percutaneous intramyocardial septal radiofrequency ablation (PIMSRA).
Methods: This study enrolled 31 adult HCM patients with HFpEF who underwent PIMSRA treatment. Electrocardiogram, imaging, and blood biochemical examinations were performed on these patients during a 6-month follow-up.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol
December 2024
Division of Cardiology, Osaka Rosai Hospital, Sakai, Osaka, Japan.
J Clin Med
September 2024
Department of Internal Medicine II, Division of Cardiology, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
The incidence of atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is high. Impaired left atrial (LA) function is a major determinant in HFpEF. However, the extent of electrical LA tissue degeneration in HFpEF is unknown.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEur Heart J Imaging Methods Pract
January 2024
Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, 3-39-22 Showa-machi, Maebashi, Gunma 371-8511, Japan.
Aims: The diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) remains challenging based on resting assessments. Exercise echocardiography is often used to unmask abnormalities that develop during exercise, but the diagnostic criteria have not been standardized. This study aimed to elucidate how cardiologists utilize exercise echocardiography to diagnose HFpEF in real-world practice.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJACC Adv
July 2024
Department of Cardiology, JESSA Hospital, Hasselt, Belgium.
Background: Women are at greater risk for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF).
Objectives: The aim of the study was to compare sex differences in the pathophysiology of exertional breathlessness in patients with high vs low HFpEF likelihood.
Methods: This cohort study evaluated consecutive patients (n = 1,936) with unexplained dyspnea using cardiopulmonary exercise testing and simultaneous echocardiography and quantified peak oxygen uptake (peak VO) and its determinants.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!