AI Article Synopsis

  • The Sydney Sexual Health Centre (SSHC) implemented the MyCheck intervention to enhance testing for bloodborne viruses and sexually transmissible infections at local pathology centers, aiming to improve client convenience and accessibility.
  • Through interviews with 11 clients and 8 staff, the study found that participants generally viewed MyCheck positively, highlighting reduced client burden and timely results, though some expressed concerns about judgmental attitudes from pathology staff.
  • While MyCheck was seen as an effective testing method, the study indicated a need for further action to mitigate stigma faced by clients at collection centers and to improve staff familiarity with the intervention.

Article Abstract

Background Sydney Sexual Health Centre (SSHC) is the largest sexual health clinic in New South Wales (NSW), servicing clients at high risk of sexually transmissible infections and bloodborne viruses. SSHC piloted a direct-to-pathology pathway that facilitated bloodborne virus/sexually transmissible infection testing at one of the ~500 participating pathology collection centres located across NSW. This qualitative study sought to understand SSHC client and provider perspectives of acceptability of the MyCheck intervention. Methods Semi-structured in-depth interviews were conducted with 11 clients who underwent testing via the MyCheck pathway and eight staff members involved in implementing MyCheck. The seven components of Sekhon's Theoretical Framework of Acceptability informed this analysis. Results Participants broadly conveyed 'affective attitude' toward the MyCheck pathway. The telehealth intervention reduced client 'burden' and 'opportunity cost' through enabling greater testing convenience at a location suitable to them and provided timely results. Issues of 'ethicality' were raised by clients and staff as pathology centre staff were, on a few occasions, regarded as being judgmental of SSHC clients. 'Intervention coherence' issues were largely attributed to pathology centre personnel being unfamiliar with the intervention, with billing issues being a recurrent concern. Participants perceived MyCheck as an 'effective' testing pathway. SSHC staff were able to offer the intervention with ease through seamless IT integration ('self-efficacy'). Conclusion The MyCheck intervention was perceived by both SSHC clients and staff as an acceptable bloodborne virus/sexually transmissible infection testing pathway. However, further work is required to address stigma experienced by some clients when attending pathology collection centres.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/SH23194DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

transmissible infection
12
acceptability mycheck
8
sexually transmissible
8
sexual health
8
bloodborne virus/sexually
8
virus/sexually transmissible
8
infection testing
8
pathology collection
8
collection centres
8
mycheck intervention
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!