Systematic reviews provide robust evidence but require significant human labor, a challenge that can be mitigated with digital tools. This paper focuses on machine learning (ML) support for the title and abstract screening phase, the most time-intensive aspect of the systematic review process. The existing literature was systematically reviewed and five promising tools were analyzed, focusing on their ability to reduce human workload and their application of ML. This paper details the current state of automation capabilities and highlights significant research findings that point towards further improvements in the field. Directions for future research in this evolving field are outlined, with an emphasis on the need for a cautious application of existing systems.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/SHTI240034DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

systematic reviews
8
machine learning
8
screening automation
4
automation systematic
4
reviews analysis
4
analysis tools
4
tools machine
4
learning capabilities
4
capabilities systematic
4
reviews provide
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!