A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

A comparison of the effects of two protocols of concurrent resistance and aerobic training on physical fitness in middle school students. | LitMetric

Objective: This study aimed to compare the effects of two concurrent training (CT) protocols on the physical fitness of middle school students.

Method: A 12-week quasi-experimental pre-test/post-test study was conducted with 157 middle school students (age = 12.48 ± 0.34, = 90 females) divided into three groups: CT group A (CT-0h) received combined resistance training (RT) and aerobic training (AT) in each physical education session, CT group B (CT-48h) received RT and AT across two separate physical education classes 48 h apart, and a control group (Con) received no training. Training occurred twice a week. Test indicators included cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) measured by estimated VOmax and 20 m shuttle run (laps), as well as muscle strength assessed through long jump, vertical jump, and handgrip strength.

Results: The intervention groups exhibited significant increases in estimated VOmax and muscle strength compared to their baseline values ( < 0.05). Both CT-0h and CT-48h groups demonstrated significant improvements in 20 m shuttle run (laps) (mean difference: 8.88 laps, < 0.01; mean difference: 4.81 laps, < 0.01, respectively), standing long jump (mean difference: 6.20 cm, < 0.01; mean difference: 3.68 cm, < 0.01, respectively), vertical jump (mean difference: 4.95 cm, < 0.01; mean difference: 4.04 cm, < 0.01, respectively), and handgrip strength (mean difference: 11.17 kg, < 0.01; mean difference: 6.99 kg, < 0.01, respectively). CT-0h group exhibited significantly increased estimated VOmax (mean difference: 1.47 ml/kg/min, < 0.01) compared to the CT-48h group.

Conclusion: Both CT programs effectively improved adolescents' physical fitness indicators. However, the program that integrated RT and AT within the same physical education class demonstrated superior enhancement in adolescents' CRF.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11048074PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.17294DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

001 difference
16
physical fitness
12
middle school
12
physical education
12
estimated vomax
12
difference
9
001
9
aerobic training
8
training physical
8
fitness middle
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!