A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

New fracture patterns distal epiphysis femur in youth: Update of current classification. | LitMetric

Intro: Distal growth core fractures of the femur are the third most common fracture in patients older than 10 years. These fractures result from high-energy trauma and have a high risk of evolving into growth disorders. The classification most used to describe these types of fractures is that described by Salter and Harris. Special clinical cases often occur in clinical practice that are not described in the classifications used. In our study, we analyzed and further focused on new fracture patterns related to pediatric epiphyseal detachments not easily described by the normal classifications currently used in the literature.

Materials And Methods: From January 2020 to December 2022, we treated 2 male clinical cases with epiphyseal detachments of the distal femur that could not be classified according to the Salter and Harris classification. Age of the patients was 10 and 11 years, respectively; for both patients, the traumatic mechanism was a direct trauma to the right knee at high speed using an electric scooter; Serious clinical and radiographic follow-ups were performed at month 1, month 3, month 6, month 12, and month 24 from the date of surgery.

Discussion: Distal femur fractures represent a challenge because they have a high incidence of complications. In our experience, there has been an increase in this type of injury caused using recently developed electric vehicles, which can reach considerable speeds. The Salter Harris classification is among the most widely used for fractures involving the growth physis. This classification proved to be rather limiting in the present case, so we decided to classify the fracture as 'Salter Harris III equivalent'.

Conclusions: The fracture examined is a very rare fracture of the distal femur and is not reflected in the classifications currently in use. The patient presented an excellent clinical and radiographic result after surgery with the presence of a shortening of the affected femur in relation to the contralateral one, which suggests that the growth deficit may continue and increase over time for which reason future studies until skeletal maturity will be necessary to quantify the damage to the growth physis.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2024.111534DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

month month
16
salter harris
12
distal femur
12
fracture patterns
8
clinical cases
8
epiphyseal detachments
8
classifications currently
8
harris classification
8
clinical radiographic
8
growth physis
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!