Navigated pedicle screw insertion with the Surgivisio system: Malposition rate and risk factors - about 648 screws.

Orthop Traumatol Surg Res

Service de chirurgie orthopédique et traumatologique, hôpital Nord, CHU de Grenoble, boulevard de la Chantourne, 38700 La Tronche, France; Université Grenoble-Alpes, Grenoble, France; CNRS UMR 5525, laboratoire TIMC-IMAG, université Grenoble-Alpes, pavillon Taillefer, 38700 La Tronche, France.

Published: April 2024

Purpose: Pedicle screw malposition rates vary greatly in scientific literature depending on the chosen criteria. Different techniques have been developed to lower the risk of screw malposition. Our primary objective is to evaluate the malposition rate associated with the use of the Surgivisio navigation system and to identify risk factors for screw malposition. The secondary objectives are to assess operating time and radiation data.

Materials And Methods: We performed a monocentric retrospective consecutive case series. All patients operated for pedicle screw implantation using the Surgivisio system between September 2017 and June 2020 were included. Screw positioning was evaluated on postoperative CT scans using Heary and Gertzbein classifications. Thirteen potential risk factors for screw malposition were hypothesized and tested with a univariate and multivariate analysis.

Results: Six hundred and forty-eight screws could be evaluated in 97 patients. Our study reported a 92.4% satisfactory screw implantation rate with a mean operative time per screw of 14.5±6.7minutes and a patient effective dose of 0.47±0.31 mSv per screw. One screw was neurotoxic and required an early revision (0.15%). Three risk factors for screw malposition have been identified in a multivariate analysis: female gender (OR=2.13 [1.11; 4], p=0.0219), an implantation level above D10 (OR=2.17 [1.13; 4.16], p=0.0197), and an "open" surgery (as opposed to percutaneous) (OR=3.47 [1.83; 6.56], p=0.0002).

Conclusion: Pedicle screw malposition rate and operative time with the Surgivisio navigation system are comparable with those reported in scientific literature. We theorized that intraoperative patient reference displacement could be a major cause of navigation failure.

Level Of Evidence: IV.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2024.103899DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

screw malposition
24
pedicle screw
16
risk factors
16
screw
13
malposition rate
12
factors screw
12
surgivisio system
8
malposition
8
scientific literature
8
surgivisio navigation
8

Similar Publications

Introduction: medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFLr) is a common surgical procedure for treating patellar instability. Grafts can be fixed to the femur using a bone-tunnel technique with an interference screw. However, this may lead to femoral tunnel enlargement (FTE) post-operatively.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: The global incidence of spinal pathology is increasing due to the progressive aging of the population and increased life expectancy. Vertebral fixation with transpedicular screws is the most commonly used technique in unstable or potentially unstable pathologies. There are different implantation methods, the most recently developed being implantation guided by robotic navigation.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: Three-dimensional (3D) navigation offers real-time guidance in surgery. However, there is limited and inconsistent data regarding the usability, safety, and efficacy. To address gaps in knowledge about 3D navigation in spinal surgery, we conducted a comprehensive review of success rates, complications, revisions, radiation exposure, and operative time associated with Federal and Drug Administration-approved 3D surgical navigation tools.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The study aimed to compare the accuracy and safety of robot-assisted and computer navigation-guided techniques for placing pedicle screws in minimally invasive spinal surgeries (MIS-TLIF).
  • The results indicated that the robot-assisted group achieved a remarkable 100% accuracy compared to 92.1% in the navigation group, with no surgeries needed for screw malposition in either group.
  • Despite the RA group having slightly longer operation times, overall, both methods proved safe and effective, with robot-assisted techniques showing superior accuracy in screw placement.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Limitations of current robot-assisted pedicle screw insertion systems.

Neurosurg Focus

December 2024

2Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neurosciences Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.

Objective: As robot systems for spine surgery have been developed, they have demonstrated a high degree of accuracy in screw placement without sacrificing safety or surgical efficiency. These robotic systems offer preoperative planning and real-time feedback to enhance surgical precision and mitigate human error. Nevertheless, limitations to their optimal performance remain.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!