AI Article Synopsis

  • This study evaluated the use of incisional negative pressure wound therapy (iNPWT) in patients after revascularisation for peripheral arterial disease compared to standard dressings.
  • A total of 133 groin incisions were assessed over varying post-operative days to determine rates of surgical site infection (SSI) and surgical site occurrence (SSO).
  • While iNPWT did not significantly alter SSI and SSO rates overall, it did show a statistically significant decrease in early SSO rates and post-operative seroma occurrences.

Article Abstract

Objective: This study assessed the potential benefits of using incisional negative pressure wound therapy (iNPWT) for patients undergoing revascularisation due to peripheral arterial disease.

Methods: A prospective randomised controlled trial was conducted to compare the inguinal application of iNPWT vs. standard surgical dressings. Patients were enrolled from February 2021 to November 2022. A total of 133 groin incisions were randomised (66 intervention group, 67 control group). The randomisation sequence was carried out by permuted blocks and allocation assigned by opening opaque envelopes once the revascularisation procedure had finished. Wound healing and complication rates were assessed at post-operative days 5, 14, and 30. Primary and secondary endpoints were: 30 day post-operative surgical site infection (SSI) and surgical site occurrence (SSO) rates, defined as a surgical wound complication other than a SSI. Post-operative SSI was defined according to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention criteria. SSO included: wound dehiscence, seroma or lymphocele, haematoma, and lymphorrhagia. The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov database (NCT04840576) and reported according to the CONSORT guidelines.

Results: iNPWT did not modify the 30 day inguinal SSI and SSO rates (16.7% vs. 20.9% and 37.9% vs. 44.8%; p = .53, relative risk [RR] 0.999, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.52 - 1.88 and p = .42, RR 1.29, 95% CI 0.89 - 1.86, respectively). It reduced the early SSO rate (19.7% vs. 35.8%; p = .044, RR 1.45, 95% CI 1.047 - 2.013) and post-operative seroma rate (4.6% vs. 19.4%; p = .014, RR 1.73, 95% CI 1.296 - 2.397).

Conclusion: There were no differences in SSI and SSO rates, although statistically significant reductions in early SSO rates and seroma were found in the intervention group.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2024.04.031DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

sso rates
16
incisional negative
8
negative pressure
8
pressure wound
8
wound therapy
8
peripheral arterial
8
intervention group
8
surgical site
8
ssi sso
8
early sso
8

Similar Publications

Introduction: Abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR) with ventral hernia repair (VHR) in the setting of contamination poses unique and controversial challenges. The purpose of this study was to examine the efficacy of onlay resorbable biosynthetic mesh against underlay biologic mesh in contaminated VHR with AWR.

Methods: A single-center retrospective review from 2015 to 2021 was performed examining subjects who underwent VHR with AWR in contaminated fields (Centers for Disease Control wound class II-IV).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The concept of preoperative prehabilitation has garnered attention as a means to manage the comorbidities of patients undergoing ventral hernia repair (VHR). In this regard, some comorbidities have been studied as potential risk factors for postoperative complications following VHR, such as diabetes, immunosuppression, and smoking. However, evidence regarding the impact of sarcopenia, defined by reduced muscle mass and highly associated with frailty syndrome, remains a gap.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

: Ventral hernia repair (VHR) is a common surgical intervention linked to specific surgical site complications. In such occurrences, the related morbidity is often substantial. Although known risk factors have long been recognized, their systematic inclusion in risk stratification systems lacks universal validation.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Aim: Posterior component separation using transversus abdominis release (TAR) is well established as an option for repair of large hernia defects. TAR can be performed robotically (rTAR) or open (oTAR) with limited data to demonstrate benefit and guide decision making. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing rTAR and oTAR approaches for ventral hernia repair (VHR).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Recent guidelines have recommended minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for unilateral inguinal hernia due to reduced chronic pain. The most performed approaches consist of posterior mesh placement by the transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) and totally extraperitoneal (TEP) techniques. However, it remains debatable whether the advantage of those techniques stems from the MIS approach or posterior mesh placement or both.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!