AI Article Synopsis

  • The study compared low-power and high-power thulium:YAG VapoEnucleation (ThuVEP) for treating benign prostatic hyperplasia in patients with large prostate volumes (>80 ml).
  • A total of 80 patients (average age 68) were randomly divided into two groups, and outcomes such as surgery duration, recovery time, and quality of life measures were assessed before and after the treatment.
  • Results showed that both methods had similar effectiveness with low complication rates, making low-power ThuVEP a safe and viable alternative to high-power options.

Article Abstract

Introduction And Objectives: To compare the perioperative and functional outcomes of low-power and high-power thulium:YAG VapoEnucleation (ThuVEP) of the prostate for the treatment of large-volume benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) (> 80 ml).

Patients And Methods: A prospective analysis of 80 patients with symptomatic BPO and prostatic enlargement (more than 80 ml) was conducted. They were divided randomly into two groups (40 patients in each group). One group was treated with low-power ThuVEP, and the other group was treated with high-power ThuVEP. All patients were assessed preoperatively and early postoperatively, and 12-month follow-up data were analyzed. The complications were noted and classified according to the modified Clavien classification system.

Results: The mean age at surgery was 68 (± 6.1) years, and the mean prostate volume was 112 (± 20.1) cc, and there were no differences between the groups (p = 0.457). The mean operative time was 88.4 ± 11.79 min for group A and 93.4 ± 16.34 min for group B, while the mean enucleation time was 59.68 ± 7.24 min for group A and 63.13 ± 10.75 min for group B. There were no significant differences between the groups regarding catheterization time and postoperative stay. The quality of life (QoL), International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax), postvoiding residual urine (PVR), and prostate volume improved significantly after treatment and were not significantly different between those treated with the different energies. The incidence of complications was low and did not differ between both the groups.

Conclusion: Low-power ThuVEP is feasible, safe, and effective with comparable results with high-power ThuVEP in the treatment of BPO.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11055731PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00345-024-04901-wDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

prospective analysis
8
benign prostatic
8
prostatic hyperplasia
8
group treated
8
low-power thuvep
8
high-power thuvep
8
prostate volume
8
differences groups
8
group
7
thuvep
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!