AI Article Synopsis

  • - This investigation aimed to see if adult patients with Class II malocclusion could be treated effectively using maxillary total arch distalization with mini-screws and customized lingual appliances.
  • - The study involved comparing treatment outcomes between two groups: 40 patients with Class I malocclusion and 40 with moderate to severe Class II malocclusion, using a grading system for orthodontic models.
  • - Results showed significant improvement in both groups, with Class II patients achieving nearly all planned corrections, and both groups meeting the American Board of Orthodontics standards after treatment, indicating the method's effectiveness.

Article Abstract

Background: The aim of the investigation was to evaluate if a Class II malocclusion in adult patients can be successfully corrected by maxillary total arch distalization with interradicular mini-screws in combination with completely customized lingual appliances (CCLA).

Methods: Two patient groups were matched for age and gender to determine differences in the quality of final treatment outcome. The treatment results of 40 adult patients with a Class I malocclusion (Group 1) were compared with those of 40 adult patients with a moderate to severe Class II malocclusion (Group 2). All patients had completed treatment with a CCLA (WIN, DW Lingual Systems, Bad Essen, Germany) without overcorrection in the individual treatment plan defined by a target set-up. To compare the treatment results of the two groups, 7 measurements using the American Board of Orthodontics Model Grading System (ABO MGS) and linear measurements for anterior-posterior (AP) and vertical dimensions were assessed at the start of lingual treatment (T1), after debonding (T2B), and compared to the individual target set-up (T2A).

Results: A statistically significant AP correction (mean 4.5 mm, min/max 2.1/8.6, SD 1.09) was achieved in Group 2, representing 99% of the planned amount. The planned overbite correction was fully achieved in both the Class I and Class II groups. There was a statistically significant improvement in the ABO scores in both groups (Group 1: 39.4 to 17.7, Group 2: 55.8 to 17.1), with no significant difference between the two groups at T2B. 95% of the adult patients in Group 1 and 95% in Group 2 would meet the ABO standards after maxillary total arch distalization with a CCLA and interradicular mini-screws.

Conclusions: CCLAs in combination with interradicular mini-screws for maxillary total arch distalization can successfully correct moderate to severe Class II malocclusions in adult patients. The quality of the final occlusal outcome is high and the amount of the sagittal correction can be predicted by the individual target set-up.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11046796PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13005-024-00425-1DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

adult patients
20
maxillary total
16
total arch
16
arch distalization
16
interradicular mini-screws
12
class malocclusion
12
target set-up
12
occlusal outcome
8
distalization interradicular
8
quality final
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!