Introduction: Over the past decade, treatment for opioid use disorder has expanded to include long-acting injectable and implantable formulations of medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD), and integrated treatment models systematically addressing both behavioral and physical health. Patient preference for these treatment options has been underexplored. Gathering data on OUD treatment preferences is critical to guide the development of patient-centered treatment for OUD. This cross-sectional study assessed preferences for long-acting MOUD and integrated treatment using an online survey.

Methods: An online Qualtrics survey assessed preferences for MOUD formulation and integrated treatment models. The study recruited participants (n = 851) in October and November 2019 through advertisements or posts on Facebook, Google AdWords, Reddit, and Amazon Mechanical Turk (mTurk). Eligible participants scored a two or higher on the opioid pain reliever or heroin scales of the Tobacco, Alcohol Prescription Medication and other Substance Use (TAPS) Tool. Structured survey items obtained patient preference for MOUD formulation and treatment model. Using stated preference methods, the study assessed preference via comparison of preferred options for MOUD and treatment model.

Results: In the past year, 824 (96.8 %) participants reported non-prescribed use of opioid pain relievers (mean TAPS score = 2.72, SD = 0.46) and 552 (64.9 %) reported heroin or fentanyl use (mean TAPS score = 2.73, SD = 0.51). Seventy-four percent of participants (n = 631) reported currently or previously receiving OUD treatment, with 407 (48.4 %) receiving MOUD. When asked about preferences for type of MOUD formulation, 452 (53.1 %) preferred a daily oral formulation, 115 (13.5 %) preferred an implant, 114 (13.4 %) preferred a monthly injection and 95 (11.2 %) preferred a weekly injection. Approximately 8.8 % (n = 75) would not consider MOUD regardless of formulation. The majority of participants (65.2 %, n = 555) preferred receiving treatment in a specialized substance use treatment program distinct from their medical care, compared with receiving care in an integrated model (n = 296, 34.8 %).

Conclusions: Though most participants expressed willingness to try long-acting MOUD formulations, the majority preferred short-acting formulations. Likewise, the majority preferred non-integrated treatment in specialty substance use settings. Reasons for these preferences provide insight on developing effective educational tools for patients and suggesting targets for intervention to develop a more acceptable treatment system.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11180569PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.josat.2024.209383DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

moud formulation
16
treatment
15
integrated treatment
12
moud
9
formulation treatment
8
treatment model
8
cross-sectional study
8
opioid disorder
8
moud integrated
8
treatment models
8

Similar Publications

Article Synopsis
  • The study is focused on the increasing issue of hospitalizations related to opioid use disorder (OUD), comparing standard addiction consultation services to a specific treatment involving a long-lasting buprenorphine injection to improve post-hospital care engagement.
  • Patients in six U.S. hospitals who were not on medication for OUD before admission will be randomly assigned either to continue usual care or receive a single dose of a 28-day extended-release buprenorphine upon discharge.
  • Outcomes will be assessed at multiple follow-up points, with the primary goal of seeing if the XR-BUP group shows higher engagement in ongoing treatment 34 days after leaving the hospital, while also monitoring for safety and various secondary effects.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD), particularly buprenorphine, are effective but adherence in outpatient settings is often low, prompting this study to explore adherence rates and influencing factors in patients starting treatment.
  • The study analyzed data from 345 patients with opioid use disorder who began buprenorphine between March 2019 and July 2021, classifying adherence through a proportion of days covered over six months.
  • Results showed that only 44% of patients were adherent; factors such as male sex and unexpected positive urine tests were linked to lower adherence, while being a former smoker correlated with higher adherence.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Patients continue to face challenges accessing medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) despite attempts to loosen prescribing restrictions and streamline service provision. Past research has mainly focused on potential barriers surrounding prescribing practices for buprenorphine, but has had limited investigation into the role of pharmacies.

Objective: This study investigates the role of both pharmacists and pharmacies in creating or circumventing barriers to accessing buprenorphine for individuals in Georgia seeking medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Importance: Serious injection-related infections (SIRIs) cause significant morbidity and mortality. Medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) improves outcomes but is underused. Understanding MOUD treatment after SIRIs could inform interventions to close this gap.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) include opioid agonist therapies (OAT) (buprenorphine and methadone), and opioid antagonists (extended-release naltrexone). All forms of MOUD improve opioid use disorder (OUD) and HIV outcomes. However, the integration of services for HIV and OUD remains inadequate.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!