AI Article Synopsis

  • Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) in children is often caused by mucopolysaccharidosis (MPS), and this study explores using wrist ultrasonography (US) as an alternative diagnostic method to traditional electrophysiological tests.
  • The study involved 27 MPS patients and 30 healthy controls, revealing that 30 out of 54 wrists in the MPS group were diagnosed with CTS, with specific measurements showing higher values in affected individuals compared to controls.
  • While the ultrasonography results showed some limitations in specificity and sensitivity, it remains a promising noninvasive diagnostic technique for CTS, especially using the wrist-forearm ratio (WFR) for analysis.

Article Abstract

Background: One of the most common causes of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) in childhood is mucopolysaccharidosis (MPS). While ultrasonography (US) can aid in the diagnosis of CTS in adult patients, there is limited experience of this in the pediatric group. We aimed to investigate the results of wrist ultrasonography, which may be a candidate alternative to electrophysiological examination.

Methods: The participants were evaluated for symptoms, physical examination findings, electrophysiological tests and grayscale US. CTS was diagnosed in accordance with the American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons Management of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guideline.

Results: Included in the study were 27 MPS patients aged 4.5-32 years and 30 healthy control subjects aged 4.3-26 years. Of the 54 wrists in the MPS group, 30 were diagnosed with CTS. The median cross-sectional area (CSA) at the proximal carpal tunnel, the CSA at the forearm, and the wrist-forearm ratio (WFR) were higher in the wrists of the MPS with CTS group than in those without CTS and the healthy control subjects. The WFR cutoff of ≥1.35, 56.6% (95% CI: 437.4-74.5) sensitivity, and 89.8% (95% CI: 81.0-95.5) specificity were consistent with a diagnosis of CTS (receiver operating characteristics analysis, area under the curve = 0.775, 95% CI: 0.673-0.877).

Conclusion: Although the US provides results with unsatisfactory specificity and sensitivity, it is a candidate for further investigation for the diagnosis of CTS because it is an innovative, noninvasive, and more accessible method. WFR value may produce more meaningful results than wrist or forearm nerve area measurements.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2024.03.032DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

carpal tunnel
16
tunnel syndrome
12
diagnosis cts
12
cts
8
healthy control
8
control subjects
8
wrists mps
8
ultrasonography reliable
4
reliable approach
4
approach evaluation
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!