Background: The efficacy and safety of adjunctive low-voltage area (LVA) ablation on outcomes of catheter ablation (CA) for atrial fibrillation (AF) remains uncertain.
Methods: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing CA with versus without LVA ablation for patients with AF. Risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were pooled with a random-effects model. Our primary endpoint was recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmia (ATA), including AF, atrial flutter, or atrial tachycardia. We used R version 4.3.1 for all statistical analyses.
Results: Our meta-analysis included 10 RCTs encompassing 1780 patients, of whom 890 (50%) were randomized to LVA ablation. Adjunctive LVA ablation significantly reduced recurrence of ATA (RR 0.76; 95% CI 0.67-0.88; p < .01) and reduced the number of redo ablation procedures (RR 0.54; 95% CI 0.35-0.85; p < .01), as compared with conventional ablation. Among 691 (43%) patients with documented LVAs on baseline substrate mapping, adjunctive LVA ablation substantially reduced ATA recurrences (RR 0.57; 95% CI 0.38-0.86; p < .01). There was no significant difference between groups in terms of periprocedural adverse events (RR 0.78; 95% CI 0.39-1.56; p = .49).
Conclusions: Adjunctive LVA ablation is an effective and safe strategy for reducing recurrences of ATA among patients who undergo CA for AF.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jce.16290 | DOI Listing |
J Electrocardiol
December 2024
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA; Alliance for Cardiovascular Diagnostic and Treatment Innovation, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Background And Purpose: Atrial fibrillation (AF), a common arrhythmia, is linked with atrial electrical and structural changes, notably low voltage areas (LVAs) which are associated with poor ablation outcomes and increased thromboembolic risk. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of a deep learning model applied to 12‑lead ECGs for non-invasively predicting the presence of LVAs, potentially guiding pre-ablation strategies and improving patient outcomes.
Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 204 AF patients, who underwent catheter ablation.
Diagnostics (Basel)
December 2024
Department of Radiology, Innsbruck Medical University, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
: Left atrial (LA) fibrosis imaging improves the guidance of LA catheter ablation. Cardiac computed tomography (CT) may be a reasonable alternative to CMR. The aim was to evaluate late enhancement (LE) fibrosis mapping by CT, and to correlate the results with low-voltage areas on electroanatomical mapping (EAM).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFN Engl J Med
November 2024
From Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland (O.M.W., W.I.S., K.W.); St. Bernards Medical Center and Arrhythmia Research Group, Jonesboro, AR (D.G.N.); the Cardiology Department, European Georges Pompidou Hospital, Paris (E.M.); Cardioangiologisches Centrum Bethanien, Agaplesion Markus Krankenhaus, Frankfurt am Main (B.S.), Catholic Hospital, Sankt Johann Nepomuk, Erfurt (H.E.), and Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité (DHZC), Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin (C.S.) - all in Germany; Iowa Heart Center, West Des Moines (T.H.); Ascension St. Vincent's Medical Center, Jacksonville, FL (S.O.); UPMC Pinnacle, Harrisburg, PA (C.P.); Vanderbilt University, Nashville (A.K.); Phoenix Cardiovascular Research Group, Phoenix AZ (A.S.); South Denver Cardiology, Littleton, CO (S.S.); Grandview Medical Center, Birmingham, AL (J. Osorio); Heart House-Cooper University, Camden, NJ (G.M.); Lindner Center for Research and Education at Christ Hospital, Cincinnati (M.G.); Emory University, Medicine, Atlanta (D.B.D.); St. Vincent Heart Center of Indiana, Indianapolis (J. Olson); the Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark (J.E.N.-K.); St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands (L.V.A.B.); the Population Health Research Institute, Hamilton, ON, Canada (J.S.H.); Brisbane AF Clinic, Greenslopes Private Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia (K.P.P.); Medstar Health Research Institute, Medstar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC (F.M.A.); Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA (K.R., T.C., B.S.S., K.M.S.); and Cardiac Electrophysiology, Mount Sinai Fuster Heart Hospital School of Medicine, New York (V.Y.R.).
Background: Oral anticoagulation is recommended after ablation for atrial fibrillation among patients at high risk for stroke. Left atrial appendage closure is a mechanical alternative to anticoagulation, but data regarding its use after atrial fibrillation ablation are lacking.
Methods: We conducted an international randomized trial involving 1600 patients with atrial fibrillation who had an elevated score (≥2 in men and ≥3 in women) on the CHADS-VASc scale (range, 0 to 9, with higher scores indicating a greater risk of stroke) and who underwent catheter ablation.
Heart Rhythm
November 2024
Institute for Cardiovascular Science, University College London, UK; St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK.
Background: Vector field heterogeneity (VFH) is a novel omnipolar metric to quantify local propagation heterogeneities that may identify functionally critical sites for ablation in scar-related ventricular tachycardia (VT).
Objective: This study aims to assess the diagnostic value of VFH to identify abnormal propagation patterns during ventricular substrate mapping and compare VFH in VT isthmus sites (IS), low-voltage bystander area (LVA) , and normal voltage areas (NVAa).
Methods: Substrate maps acquired with a 16-pole grid catheter in patients with scar-related VT were segmented into sites corresponding to IS, LVA, and NVA (defined as omnipolar voltages > and <1.
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis
October 2024
Department of Cardiology, Shanghai Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!