No evidence of difference in mortality with amoxicillin versus co-amoxiclav for hospital treatment of community-acquired pneumonia.

J Infect

Big Data Institute, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; The National Institute for Health Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Department of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK; The National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare Associated Infections and Antimicrobial Resistance at the University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. Electronic address:

Published: June 2024

AI Article Synopsis

  • This study looked at how two types of antibiotics, amoxicillin (narrow-spectrum) and co-amoxiclav (broad-spectrum), affect patients with pneumonia.
  • Researchers analyzed data from many patients over a period of several years to see if the type of antibiotic made a difference in survival rates after 30 days.
  • The results showed that there was no significant difference in survival between the two antibiotics, suggesting that amoxicillin could be used more often without harming patients.

Article Abstract

Objectives: Current guidelines recommend broad-spectrum antibiotics for high-severity community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), potentially contributing to antimicrobial resistance (AMR). We aim to compare outcomes in CAP patients treated with amoxicillin (narrow-spectrum) versus co-amoxiclav (broad-spectrum), to understand if narrow-spectrum antibiotics could be used more widely.

Methods: We analysed electronic health records from adults (≥16 y) admitted to hospital with a primary diagnosis of pneumonia between 01-January-2016 and 30-September-2023 in Oxfordshire, United Kingdom. Patients receiving baseline ([-12 h,+24 h] from admission) amoxicillin or co-amoxiclav were included. The association between 30-day all-cause mortality and baseline antibiotic was examined using propensity score (PS) matching and inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) to address confounding by baseline characteristics and disease severity. Subgroup analyses by disease severity and sensitivity analyses with missing covariates imputed were also conducted.

Results: Among 16,072 admissions with a primary diagnosis of pneumonia, 9685 received either baseline amoxicillin or co-amoxiclav. There was no evidence of a difference in 30-day mortality between patients receiving initial co-amoxiclav vs. amoxicillin (PS matching: marginal odds ratio 0.97 [0.76-1.27], p = 0.61; IPTW: 1.02 [0.78-1.33], p = 0.87). Results remained similar across stratified analyses of mild, moderate, and severe pneumonia. Results were also similar with missing data imputed. There was also no evidence of an association between 30-day mortality and use of additional macrolides or additional doxycycline.

Conclusions: There was no evidence of co-amoxiclav being advantageous over amoxicillin for treatment of CAP in 30-day mortality at a population-level, regardless of disease severity. Wider use of narrow-spectrum empirical treatment of moderate/severe CAP should be considered to curb potential for AMR.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2024.106161DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

disease severity
12
30-day mortality
12
evidence difference
8
versus co-amoxiclav
8
community-acquired pneumonia
8
primary diagnosis
8
diagnosis pneumonia
8
patients receiving
8
amoxicillin co-amoxiclav
8
association 30-day
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!