AI Article Synopsis

  • Basilar artery occlusion (BAO) can result from either embolism or thrombosis due to basilar stenosis, with the latter (BAOS) leading to worse clinical outcomes compared to embolic occlusions (BAOE).
  • A study involving 199 patients found that specific brain regions, particularly the medulla oblongata and inferior pons, played a critical role in predicting unfavorable early outcomes after BAO, with BAOS patients having larger infarct volumes.
  • Successful reperfusion was more common in BAOE patients, indicating that differences in occlusion type and brain stem infarct patterns significantly impact recovery and outcomes after treatment.

Article Abstract

Objectives: Basilar artery occlusion (BAO) may be etiologically attributed to embolism or in situ thrombosis due to basilar stenosis (BS). Patients with BAO due to BS (BAOS) are known to have worse outcomes than patients with embolic occlusions (BAOE). BAOS occurs more proximally in the basilar artery (BA) than BAOE. We hypothesize that differing brain stem infarct patterns contribute to outcome differences between these stroke etiologies.

Methods: This retrospective study includes 199 consecutive patients with BAO who received endovascular treatment at a single center. Final infarction in brain parenchyma dependent on the posterior circulation was graded semiquantitatively on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Associations to underlying stenosis and angiographic and clinical outcome variables were tested. The primary endpoint was early good clinical outcome (EGCO, mRS score ≤ 3 at discharge).

Results: Infarct extension of the medulla oblongata (OR = 0.25; 95% CI = 0.07-0.86; p = 0.03), the inferior pons (OR = 0.328; 95% CI = 0.17-0.63; p = 0.001), the superior pons (OR = 0.57; 95% CI = 0.33-0.99; p = 0.046), and the occipital lobes (OR = 0.46; 95% CI = 0.26-0.80; p = 0.006) negatively predicted EGCO. Infarct extension for other posterior-circulation-dependent brain regions was not independently associated with unfavorable early outcomes. Patients with BAOS had more proximal occlusions and greater infarct volumes in the inferior brain stem. Successful reperfusion (mTICI 2b-3) occurred more often in patients with BAOE than in BAOS (BAOE: 131 (96.3%); BAOS: 47 (83.9%), p = 0.005).

Conclusion: Unfavorable early outcomes in patients with BAOS may be explained by a higher likelihood of inferior brain stem infarcts and lower rates of reperfusion success.

Clinical Relevance Statement: Basilar artery occlusion due to underlying stenosis is associated with a poorer prognosis than that caused by embolism; these results suggest that aggressive endovascular therapy, usually involving the placement of a permanent stent, may be warranted in these patients.

Key Points: Inferior brain stem and occipital infarcts are prognostically unfavorable in basilar artery occlusion. Basilar artery occlusion due to stenosis occurs more proximally and is associated with worse outcomes. Differentiating etiologies of basilar artery occlusion may influence how aggressively treated the occlusion is.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11399215PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-024-10755-yDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

basilar artery
28
artery occlusion
24
brain stem
16
clinical outcome
12
outcomes patients
12
inferior brain
12
basilar
8
retrospective study
8
patients bao
8
worse outcomes
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!