Deaf and hard of hearing (d/DHH) students are often labeled with one or more educationally significant disabilities in addition to their hearing loss. According to the Gallaudet Research Institution's most recent Annual Survey of Deaf and Hard of Hearing Children and Youth (2013), almost 40% of d/DHH students nationwide receive special education services for one or more comorbid disabilities. However, relatively few prevalence rate estimates have been published over the last decade. Knowledge regarding the current prevalence of educationally significant disabilities among d/DHH students is therefore limited. The present study surveyed teachers of the deaf and hard of hearing (TODHHs) in a midwestern state regarding the number of d/DHH students on their caseloads with one or more comorbid disabilities. Within the sample population (N = 451), nearly 65% were reported to receive special education services for disabilities other than deafness or hearing impairment.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/aad.2023.0001 | DOI Listing |
Med Humanit
January 2025
Audiology, University of the Witwatersrand Johannesburg Faculty of Humanities, Johannesburg, Gauteng, South Africa.
Family-centred intervention optimises the development of communication abilities and academic outcomes in children with hearing loss. Cognisance of family values, respect for family differences and adaptations to cultural and linguistic diversity ensure the collaboration of parent-professional relationships. This study investigated the parental involvement and parental perceptions regarding the communication intervention approaches implemented (i.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAfr J Disabil
December 2024
Department of Audiology, Faculty of Human and Community Development, University of the Witwatersrand, Braamfontein, South Africa.
Background: Parents of Deaf or hard-of-hearing (DHH) children are faced with a plethora of overwhelming decisions concerning their children, particularly during the early stages of development. Among these decisions are those concerning assistive devices and the modes of communication for their child.
Objectives: The aim of this study was to explore the perceptions of parents of DHH children towards the various modes of communication for their children within the South African context.
J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ
January 2025
Department of Theory and Practice in Teacher Education, The University of Tennessee, A216 Jane and David Bailey Education Complex, 1126 Volunteer Boulevard, Knoxville, TN 37996, United States.
J Acoust Soc Am
January 2025
Department of Apparel and Space Design, Kyoto Women's University, Kyoto, Kyoto 605-8501, Japan.
Ever since de Saussure [Course in General Lingustics (Columbia University Press, 1916)], theorists of language have assumed that the relation between form and meaning of words is arbitrary. However, recently, a body of empirical research has established that language is embodied and contains iconicity. Sound symbolism, an intrinsic link language users perceive between word sound and properties of referents, is a representative example of iconicity in language and has offered profound insights into theories of language pertaining to language processing, language acquisition, and evolution.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEar Hear
January 2025
Dutch Foundation of the Deaf and Hard of Hearing Child (NSDSK), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Objectives: One important aspect in facilitating language access for children with hearing loss (HL) is the auditory environment. An optimal auditory environment is characterized by high signal to noise ratios (SNRs), low background noise levels, and low reverberation times. In this study, the authors describe the auditory environment of early intervention groups specifically equipped for young children with HL.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!