AI Article Synopsis

  • The study analyzed the rate of loss to follow up (LTFU) among patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) in the U.S. who underwent anti-VEGF therapy and/or panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) from 2013 to 2018.
  • 11.7% of eyes treated for PDR were found to be LTFU, with varying rates for different treatment types: 12.3% for anti-VEGF, 12.6% for PRP, and 10.8% for combined treatments.
  • Risk factors for LTFU included minority racial/ethnic backgrounds, unilateral disease, and worse baseline vision, while patients with

Article Abstract

Purpose: To determine the rate of loss to follow up (LTFU) in patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) treated with anti-VEGF therapy and/or panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) in the United States.

Design: Retrospective cohort study using the national IRIS® (Intelligent Research in Sight) Registry data.

Subjects: A total of 73 595 eyes of 56 590 patients with PDR diagnosed between 2013 and 2015 and treated between 2013 and 2018.

Methods: Multivariable logistic regression models were used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Main Outcome Measures: Loss to follow up was no follow up within 12 months from last treatment.

Results: For patient eyes treated for PDR, 11.7% (95% CI, 11.5-12.0) were LTFU. Among patients with PDR treated with anti-VEGF therapy alone, PRP alone, and anti-VEGF and PRP, the rates of LTFU were 12.3% (95% CI, 11.8-12.7), 12.6% (95% CI, 12.1-13.0), and 10.8% (95% CI, 10.4-11.1), respectively. Risk factors for LTFU include Black or African American race/ethnicity (odds ratio [OR], 1.26; 95% CI, 1.13-1.41; P < 0.001), Hispanic ethnicity (OR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.16-1.42; P < 0.001), Native American/Alaska Native or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander race/ethnicity (OR, 2.69; 95% CI, 2.14-3.38; P < 0.001), and unilateral disease (OR, 2.05; CI, 1.88-2.23; P < 0.001). Odds for LTFU were higher with patients with baseline vision of 20/50 to 20/200 (OR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.15-1.36; P < 0.001) and with vision worse than 20/200 (OR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.05-1.42; P = 0.01) than for patient eyes with a baseline visual acuity of 20/40 or better. Odds for LTFU were lower for Medicare Fee-for-Service (OR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.64-0.79; P < 0.001) and Medicare Managed (OR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.56-0.78; P < 0.001) compared with private insurance. Odds for LTFU were lower for patients treated in the Midwest (OR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.64-0.81; P < 0.001) and West (OR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.74-0.94; P = 0.003) compared with in the South region.

Conclusions: The rate of LTFU is between 10% and 12% among patients with PDR who were treated with anti-VEGF injections and/or PRP. Risk factors include Black or African American race/ethnicity, Hispanic ethnicity, baseline vision worse than 20/40, private insurance, South region, and unilateral disease.

Financial Disclosure(s): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.oret.2024.04.016DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

treated anti-vegf
16
95%
14
loss follow
12
anti-vegf therapy
12
pdr treated
12
patients pdr
12
odds ltfu
12
patients proliferative
8
proliferative diabetic
8
diabetic retinopathy
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!