Leveraging QSP Models for MIPD: A Case Study for Warfarin/INR.

Clin Pharmacol Ther

Institute of Mathematics, Mathematical Modelling and Systems Biology, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany.

Published: September 2024

AI Article Synopsis

  • - Warfarin dosing is complicated by individual differences, and model-informed precision dosing (MIPD) aims to tailor doses to individual patients, although model selection is crucial for accuracy.
  • - Quantitative system pharmacology (QSP) models can improve dosing predictions but face challenges in validation and complexity; they were tested in this study using a previously developed warfarin/INR model.
  • - The study showed that the warfarin/INR model, especially when incorporating genetic factors like CYP2C9 and VKORC1, performed well compared to standard models, although adjustments may be needed for outpatient scenarios where data showed more variability.

Article Abstract

Warfarin dosing remains challenging due to substantial inter-individual variability, which can lead to unsafe or ineffective therapy with standard dosing. Model-informed precision dosing (MIPD) can help individualize warfarin dosing, requiring the selection of a suitable model. For models developed from clinical data, the dependence on the study design and population raises questions about generalizability. Quantitative system pharmacology (QSP) models promise better extrapolation abilities; however, their complexity and lack of validation on clinical data raise questions about applicability in MIPD. We have previously derived a mechanistic warfarin/international normalized ratio (INR) model from a blood coagulation QSP model. In this article, we evaluated the predictive performance of the warfarin/INR model in the context of MIPD using an external dataset with INR data from patients starting warfarin treatment. We assessed the accuracy and precision of model predictions, benchmarked against an empirically based reference model. Additionally, we evaluated covariate contributions and assessed the predictive performance separately in the more challenging outpatient data. The warfarin/INR model performed comparably to the reference model across various measures despite not being calibrated with warfarin initiation data. Including CYP2C9 and/or VKORC1 genotypes as covariates improved the prediction quality of the warfarin/INR model, even after assimilating 4 days of INR data. The outpatient INR exhibited higher unexplained variability, and predictions slightly exceeded observed values, suggesting that model adjustments might be necessary when transitioning from an inpatient to an outpatient setting. Overall, this research underscores the potential of QSP-derived models for MIPD, offering a complementary approach to empirical model development.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cpt.3274DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

warfarin/inr model
12
model
11
qsp models
8
models mipd
8
warfarin dosing
8
clinical data
8
predictive performance
8
inr data
8
reference model
8
data
6

Similar Publications

Leveraging QSP Models for MIPD: A Case Study for Warfarin/INR.

Clin Pharmacol Ther

September 2024

Institute of Mathematics, Mathematical Modelling and Systems Biology, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany.

Article Synopsis
  • - Warfarin dosing is complicated by individual differences, and model-informed precision dosing (MIPD) aims to tailor doses to individual patients, although model selection is crucial for accuracy.
  • - Quantitative system pharmacology (QSP) models can improve dosing predictions but face challenges in validation and complexity; they were tested in this study using a previously developed warfarin/INR model.
  • - The study showed that the warfarin/INR model, especially when incorporating genetic factors like CYP2C9 and VKORC1, performed well compared to standard models, although adjustments may be needed for outpatient scenarios where data showed more variability.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Warfarin is a challenging drug to administer due to the narrow therapeutic index of the International Normalized Ratio (INR), the inter- and intra-variability of patients, limited clinical data, genetics, and the effects of other medications. To predict the optimal warfarin dosage in the presence of the aforementioned challenges, we present an adaptive individualized modeling framework based on model (In)validation and semi-blind robust system identification. The model (In)validation technique adapts the identified individualized patient model according to the change in the patient's status to ensure the model's suitability for prediction and controller design.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Historically, warfarin or aspirin have been the recommended therapeutic options for the extended treatment (>3 months) of VTE. Data from Phase III randomised controlled trials (RCTs) are now available for non-VKA oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in this indication. The current systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) were conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of anticoagulants for the extended treatment of VTE.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background And Purpose: We performed a combination of prespecified and exploratory subgroup analyses to detect any treatment differences among various baseline subgroups in the Warfarin-Aspirin Recurrent Stroke Study (WARSS) cohort.

Methods: The WARSS compared the efficacy of adjusted-dose warfarin (INR 1.4-2.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!