Background: Primary hyperparathyroidism is underdiagnosed and surgical treatment is underutilized and inequitably distributed. We present a review of the current literature on disparities in the treatment of hyperparathyroidism, with a focus on gaps in knowledge and paths forward.

Methods: We searched PubMed and Scopus for abstracts related to disparities in hyperparathyroidism.

Results: 16 articles (of 1541) met inclusion criteria. The most commonly examined disparity was race. Notably, Black, Hispanic, and Asian patients were less likely to undergo surgery after diagnosis, face delays in obtaining treatment, and less likely to see a high-volume surgeon. Similar disparities in care were noted among those without insurance, older patients, and patients with limited English proficiency.

Conclusion: There are clear inequities in the treatment of hyperparathyroidism. Current research is in an early "identification" phase of disparities research; a new conceptual model based on established socioecological frameworks is provided to help move the field forward to "understanding" and "intervening" in surgical disparities.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.04.010DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

disparities treatment
8
primary hyperparathyroidism
8
conceptual model
8
treatment hyperparathyroidism
8
disparities
6
treatment primary
4
hyperparathyroidism
4
hyperparathyroidism scoping
4
scoping review
4
review conceptual
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!