Purpose Of Review: There is widespread use of emergency preparedness drills in public K-12 schools across the US, but considerable variability exists in the types of protocols used and how these practices are conducted. This review examines research into both "lockdown drills" and "active shooter drills" as it relates to their impact on participants across different outcomes and evaluations of their procedural integrity.
Recent Findings: A number of studies on lockdown drills yielded largely consistent findings about their impacts, whereas findings related to the effects of active shooter drills are less uniform. The research also demonstrated that lockdown drills, though not active shooter drills, can help participants build skill mastery to be able to successfully deploy the procedure. Differences in how drills impact participants and whether they cultivate skill mastery are largely attributable to the type of drill being conducted. This review suggests that employing clearly defined drill procedures incorporating best practices, coupled with instructional training, can help schools prepare for emergencies without creating trauma for participants.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11920-024-01502-7 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Community health system capacities and capabilities within an evolving community health policy framework: mixed methods study of stakeholders in central Uganda.
BMJ Open
January 2025
Department of Health Policy Planning and Management, Makerere University School of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda
Objectives: Empowering communities through identifying and unlocking community capacities and capabilities is vital for improving community health systems. This study assessed the community health system's status quo and readiness for implementing a government-led, partner-supported community health worker project.
Design: A mixed methods cross-sectional study.
Stewarding COVID-19 health systems response in Pakistan: what more can be done for a primary health care approach to future pandemics?
BMJ Glob Health
January 2025
Pakistan Ministry of National Health Services Regulations and Coordination, Islamabad, Pakistan.
We apply a primary healthcare (PHC) perspective to gauge Pakistan's health systems response to COVID-19, to identify stewardship lessons for integrating the PHC pandemic response. Analysis of Pakistan's response against the Astana PHC framework shows that the imperative for national survival helped mobilise an agile response across a fragmented health security context. The findings show effective multisector governance in responding to the health and social aspects of the pandemic, as well as the rapid roll-out of several public health functions and emergency care.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFThe impact of an All-Hazard mass casualty event on emergency department operations: A retrospective study.
Am J Emerg Med
January 2025
Medical Management, Shamir Medical Center (Formerly Assaf Harofeh), Zerifin, Israel, An Affiliated of the Faculty of Medical & Health Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Background: Mass Casualty Events (MCI) which have a direct and persisting impact on the safety and well-being of an emergency department (ED) and its staff, secondary to specific targeting of the healthcare setting, represent a distinct and complex operational challenge. ED physicians may be faced with the prospect of providing ongoing patient care while simultaneously experiencing direct threats to their own health or physical safety. In our study we considered the unique operational challenges encountered, and management strategies adopted, by the ED staff and its leadership to an all-hazard MCI impacting an academic urban emergency department.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWant AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!