Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Unlabelled: Blood glycosylated hemoglobin level can be affected by various factors in patients with type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular diseases. Frequent measurements are expensive, and a suitable estimation method could improve treatment outcomes.
Patients And Methods: 93 patients were recruited in this research. We analyzed a number of parameters such as age, glucose level, blood pressure, Body Mass Index, cholesterol level, echocardiography et al. Patients were prescribed metformin. One group (n=60) additionally was taking sitagliptin. We applied eight machine learning methods (k nearest neighbors, Random Forest, Support Vector Machine, Extra Trees, XGBoost, Linear Regression including Lasso, and ElasticNet) to predict exact values of glycosylated hemoglobin in two years.
Results: We applied a feature selection approach using step-by-step removal of them, Linear Regression on remaining features, and Pearson's correlation coefficient on the validation set. As a result, we got four different subsets for each group. We compared all eight Machine Learning methods using different hyperparameters on validation sets and chose the best models. We tested the best models on the external testing set and got R = 0.88, C Index = 0.857, Accuracy = 0.846, and MAE (Mean Absolute Error) = 0.65 for the first group, R = 0.86, C Index = 0.80, Accuracy = 0.75, and MAE = 0.41 for the second group.
Conclusion: The resulting algorithms could be used to assist clinical decision-making on prescribing anti-diabetic medications in pursuit of achieving glycemic control.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11024317 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2024.1305640 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!