AI Article Synopsis
- Experts studied eyewitness memory to help courts understand how memories can change over time.
- The last big survey on this topic was over 20 years ago, so new opinions were needed to keep everyone informed.
- The new survey included 76 scientists and shows that while some views stayed the same, experts now have different thoughts on confidence in memories and how lineups should be done.
Article Abstract
Experimental psychologists investigating eyewitness memory have periodically gathered their thoughts on a variety of eyewitness memory phenomena. Courts and other stakeholders of eyewitness research rely on the expert opinions reflected in these surveys to make informed decisions. However, the last survey of this sort was published more than 20 years ago, and the science of eyewitness memory has developed since that time. Stakeholders need a current database of expert opinions to make informed decisions. In this article, we provide that update. We surveyed 76 scientists for their opinions on eyewitness memory phenomena. We compared these current expert opinions to expert opinions from the past several decades. We found that experts today share many of the same opinions as experts in the past and have more nuanced thoughts about two issues. Experts in the past endorsed the idea that confidence is weakly related to accuracy, but experts today acknowledge the potential diagnostic value of initial confidence collected from a properly administered lineup. In addition, experts in the past may have favored sequential over simultaneous lineup presentation, but experts today are divided on this issue. We believe this new survey will prove useful to the court and to other stakeholders of eyewitness research.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17456916241234837 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Timing of pre-retrieval warnings matters in reducing memory errors in a repeated testing misinformation study.
Sci Rep
January 2025
Department of Psychology, Tufts University, Medford, MA, USA.
Individuals are often exposed to information regarding previously witnessed events. The misinformation effect occurs when inaccurate post-event information impairs accuracy on a subsequent test of memory for the original event. The misinformation effect is increased when a test is given prior to exposure to post-event information, a phenomenon termed Retrieval Enhanced Suggestibility (RES).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFSleep and retrieval practice both strengthen and distort story recollection.
Sleep Adv
November 2024
Department of Psychology, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, USA.
Over time, memories lose episodic detail and become distorted, a process with serious ramifications for eyewitness identification. What are the processes contributing to such transformations over time? We investigated the roles of post-learning sleep and retrieval practice in memory accuracy and distortion, using a naturalistic story recollection task. Undergraduate students listened to a recording of the "War of the Ghosts," a Native American folktale, and were assigned to either a sleep or wake delay group, and either a retrieval practice or listen-only study condition.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFIdentification performance across the life span: Lineups and the reaction time-based Concealed Information Test.
Cognition
January 2025
Department of Clinical Psychology, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Electronic address:
Cognitive and social factors can deteriorate eyewitness identification performance in children and older adults. An identification procedure that mitigates the effect of such factors could be beneficial for child and older adult witnesses. In a field experiment, we mapped identification performance in a large community sample (N = 1239) across the lifespan (ages 6-79 years) for two different identification procedures: classic lineups and reaction time-based Concealed Information Test (RT-CIT).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFThe effects of deception on memory: a comparative study of actors and eyewitnesses accounts.
BMC Psychol
November 2024
School of Education and Psychological Science, Sichuan University of Science & Engineering, Huixing Road No. 519, Ziliujing District, Zigong, 643000, Sichuan, China.
Deception is a common occurrence in daily life and has been shown to impair memory. This study investigated the memory-undermining effects of deception in a simulated daily life scenario, focusing on the potential moderating effect of the liars' role (i.e.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFThe effect of lineup size on discriminability is dependent on filler similarity and independent of encoding strength.
Mem Cognit
November 2024
Department of Psychology, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA.
A photo lineup, which consists of one suspect and several physically similar fillers, is often used by the police to test an eyewitness's memory. To optimize memory performance, how similar should the fillers be to the suspect, and how many fillers should be included in the lineup? Recent work suggests that using fillers who match the basic characteristics of the perpetrator (e.g.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWant AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!