AI Article Synopsis

  • - Marginal zone lymphomas (MZL) are a group of related subtypes that currently lack a standardized prognostic score for patients requiring systemic therapy.
  • - Researchers developed a prognostic model based on a study of 501 patients, identifying five important factors that significantly affect progression-free survival (PFS) and creating three risk categories: low, intermediate, and high.
  • - The newly proposed MZL International Prognostic Index (MZL-IPI) has been validated in multiple patient cohorts, showing reliable predictive value for both PFS and overall survival (OS) among MZL patients undergoing treatment.

Article Abstract

Background: Marginal zone lymphomas (MZL), comprised of three unique but related subtypes, lack a unifying prognostic score applicable to all the patients in need for systemic chemotherapy and/or immunotherapy.

Methods: Patients from the prospective NF10 study (NCT02904577) with newly diagnosed MZL and receiving frontline systemic therapy at diagnosis or after observation were used to train a prognostic model. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) from start of treatment. The model was externally validated in a pooled analysis of two independent cohorts from the University of Iowa and Mayo Clinic Molecular Epidemiology Resource and the University of Miami.

Findings: We identified 501 eligible patients. After multivariable modeling, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) above upper normal limit, hemoglobin <12 g/dL, absolute lymphocyte count <1 × 10/L, platelets <100 × 10/L, and MZL subtype (nodal or disseminated) were independently associated with inferior PFS. The proposed MZL International Prognostic index (MZL-IPI) combined these 5 factors, and we defined low (LRG, 0 factors, 27%), intermediate (IRG, 1-2 factors, 57%) and high (HRG, 3+ factors, 16%) risk groups with 5-y PFS of 85%, 66%, and 37%, respectively (c-Harrell = 0.64). Compared to the LRG, the IRG (Hazard Ratio [HR] = 2.30, 95% CI 1.39-3.80) and HRG (HR = 5.41, 95% CI 3.12-9.38) had inferior PFS. Applying the MZL-IPI to the pooled US cohort (N = 353), 94 (27%), 192 (54%), and 67 (19%) patients were classified as LRG, IRG, and HRG, respectively, and the model was validated for PFS (log-rank test p = 0.0018; c-Harrell = 0.578, 95% CI 0.54-0.62). The MZL-IPI was also prognostic for OS in both the training and the external validation sets.

Interpretation: MZL-IPI is a new prognostic score for use in all patients with MZL considered for systemic treatment.

Funding: The MER was supported by P50 CA97274 and U01 CA195568.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11019091PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102592DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

marginal zone
12
unifying prognostic
8
zone lymphomas
8
zone lymphoma
4
lymphoma international
4
prognostic
4
international prognostic
4
prognostic unifying
4
prognostic marginal
4
lymphomas requiring
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!