Protraction of mandibular posterior teeth into edentulous regions is challenging in clinical practice. This case demonstrated a minor tooth movement of a mandibular second molar to substitute its adjacent missing first molar in a 15-year-old female. An efficient bodily movement of the mandibular second molar was achieved through a mini-implant-anchored protraction loop appliance. With this carefully designed biomechanical system, over 10-mm molar protraction was accomplished within 14 months without mesial or lingual tipping. The adjacent third molar erupted spontaneously during the protraction process and drafted mesially. Through brackets and segmented archwire after the protraction, the second and third molars were successfully protracted and good buccal interdigitation was achieved. The combination of the Albert protraction loop and mini-implant allows for more efficient protraction of the mandibular molars, avoiding mesial tipping and lingual rotation of the molars.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11020604PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.58397DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

protraction mandibular
12
mandibular second
12
second molar
12
protraction
8
adjacent missing
8
missing molar
8
loop appliance
8
movement mandibular
8
protraction loop
8
molar
7

Similar Publications

Protraction of a second molar and a mesially-impacted third molar into the adjacent first-molar extraction site through mini-implant anchored Albert protraction loop with the aid of alveolar ridge augmentation.

Int Orthod

January 2025

Department of Orthodontics, State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases & National Center for Stomatology & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, 610041 Chengdu, China. Electronic address:

Protraction of a mandibular second molar to substitute the adjacent missing first molar is challenging in clinical practice. In this case report, we demonstrated a 21-year-old patient with an untreatable periapical lesion of the mandibular right first molar. The adjacent mandibular second molar had normal root length and the third molar was mesially-impacted.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: This study evaluated the dentoskeletal effects of miniscrew-anchored maxillary protraction, which included a mandibular anchorage bar and a night facemask in adolescents.

Methods: A total of 20 growing patients with Class III malocclusion and maxillary deficiency were treated with a hybrid hyrax expander with 2 miniscrews in the maxilla and a mandibular anchor bar supported in 2 miniscrews in the anterior region of the mandible. Class III elastics were used from the maxillary first molars to the mandibular anchorage bar, joining the mandibular miniscrews installed between permanent incisors and canines.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: The purpose of this retrospective study was to compare the dento-skeletal changes observed in growing Class III patients treated with the Face Mask Protocol (FMP) with and without Bite Block (BB).

Materials: Thirty subjects (12 f, 18 m) who underwent FM/BB therapy were compared to a matched group (FM) of 29 patients (15 f, 14 m) treated without BB. All patients were evaluated before treatment (T0), at the end of active treatment (T1), and at a post-pubertal follow-up observation (T2).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Maxillary protraction anchored on miniplates versus miniscrews: three-dimensional dentoskeletal comparison.

Eur J Orthod

December 2024

Department of Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan, 1011 N University Ave, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, United States.

Objective: This retrospective study aimed to compare the three-dimensional (3D) outcomes of the novel miniscrew-anchored maxillary protraction (MAMP) therapy and the bone-anchored maxillary protraction (BAMP) therapy.

Methods: The sample comprised growing patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion treated with two skeletal anchored maxillary protraction protocols. The MAMP group comprised 22 patients (9 female, 13 male; 10.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: To evaluate the outcomes of skeletal anchorage-supported maxillary protraction and prostetic restoration in a patient with class III malocclusion and hypodontia.

Methods: Anchorage plates were placed in the apertura piriformis region as skeletal anchorage support. Subsequently, 500 g orthopedic force per side was applied for maxillary protraction.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!