A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Initial outcomes and surgical techniques of prostatic urethral lift for benign prostatic hyperplasia in Japan. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • The prostatic urethral lift (PUL) is a minimally invasive surgery for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) that has been in use in Japan since April 2022, and this study aimed to evaluate its initial outcomes and techniques.
  • In a study of 50 patients, the median age was 71 years, and the procedure took about 20 minutes on average, with no major complications reported, allowing for same-day discharge after surgery.
  • Results showed significant improvements in symptoms, quality of life, and urinary flow rates at 1 and 3 months post-surgery, highlighting the importance of bladder neck lifting during the procedure for better outcomes. *

Article Abstract

Objectives: The prostatic urethral lift (PUL) has been used as a minimally invasive surgery for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) since April 2022 in Japan. This study evaluated the initial outcomes and surgical techniques of PUL for BPH.

Methods: In this prospective, single-center study, indications were based on the proper use guidelines for PUL in Japan. Preoperative patient status, postoperative progress at 1 and 3 months, and perioperative complications were evaluated. The surgical technique was changed twice, and the subgroup analysis and technique were evaluated.

Results: Of the 50 patients who underwent surgeries performed by a single surgeon, the median age and prostate volume were 71 years and 42.0 mL, respectively. Furthermore, the median operative time and number of implants used were 20 min and 5, respectively. No postoperative fever or severe hematuria requiring reoperation occurred. All patients were discharged from the hospital the day following the PUL, as scheduled. Postoperative International Prostate Symptom Score, quality of life score, maximum flow rate, and postvoid residual volume at 1 and 3 months were significantly improved compared with the preoperative values. A significant improvement in maximum flow rate was observed in the subgroup analysis from 1 month postoperatively in the group with an anterior channel creation focus.

Conclusions: PUL is effective and safe in cases with prostate volumes of <100 mL. Lifting the bladder neck is important for opening an anterior prostatic urethral channel and improving urinary function during the early postoperative period.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11256867PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iju.15461DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

initial outcomes
8
outcomes surgical
8
surgical techniques
8
prostatic urethral
8
urethral lift
8
benign prostatic
8
prostatic hyperplasia
8
subgroup analysis
8
maximum flow
8
flow rate
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!