Unlabelled: All four UK and devolved governments performed a 'U-turn' on their COVID-19 school exams replacement policies. After cancelling exams, they sought teacher estimates on their grades, but supported an algorithm to standardise the results. When the results produced a public outcry over unfair consequences, they initially defended their decision but reverted quickly to teacher assessment. We explain these developments by comparing two 'windows of opportunity' overseen by four separate governments, in which the definition of the problem, feasibility of each solution, and motive of policymakers to select one over the other lurched dramatically within a week of the exams results. These experiences highlight the confluence of events and choices and the timing and order of choice. A policy solution that had been rejected during the first window, and would have been criticised heavily if chosen first, became a lifeline during the second. As such, while it is important to understand , we focus on .
Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1057/s41293-021-00162-y.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7894241 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/s41293-021-00162-y | DOI Listing |
Am J Surg
January 2025
Association of Women Surgeons, Chicago, IL, USA.
Background: The COVID-19 pandemic brought additional challenges to the 2020-2021 application cycle. The objective of this study was to explore how such challenges altered the perceptions/motivations/concerns of applicants to surgical fields, particularly those self-identifying as women underrepresented-in-medicine (UiM).
Methods: An anonymous mixed-methods survey was electronically distributed to all medical student members of the Association of Women Surgeons between 10/1/2020-12/31/2020.
Anat Sci Educ
January 2025
Tissue Engineering Group, Department of Histology, Medical School, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
The recent coronavirus disease (COVID-19) forced pre-university professionals to modify the educational system. This work aimed to determine the effects of pandemic situation on students' access to medical studies by comparing the performance of medical students. We evaluated the performance of students enrolled in a subject taught in the first semester of the medical curriculum in two pre-pandemic academic years (PRE), two post-pandemic years (POST), and an intermediate year (INT) using the results of a final multiple-choice exam.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFFolia Morphol (Warsz)
January 2025
Tekirdağ Namık Kemal University School of MedicineTekirdağ, Türkiye.
Background: Distance education emerged as a potential solution to enhance access, standardize content, and facilitate updates. However, student perceptions varied widely. The COVID-19 pandemic prompted a rapid shift towards distance education in anatomy, presenting challenges and opportunities for medical students globally.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFTrans R Soc Trop Med Hyg
January 2025
Department of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery, Faculdade de Medicina de São José do Rio Preto, SP, 15090-000, Brazil.
Background: Immunological similarities led us to explore potential interactions between Chagas heart disease (CHD) and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). We evaluated CHD's impact on the short- and long-term clinical courses of COVID-19 patients.
Methods: The CHD group comprised consecutive hospitalized patients (March 2020-March 2022), while the controls were selected through genetic matching based on COVID complications predictors.
BMC Med Educ
December 2024
Medical Education Department, Faculty of Medicine, Dar Al Uloom University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Aim: Whether case-based modified essay questions (MEQs) are crucial to summative assessment in medical curriculum is still debatable. The current study aimed to evaluate third-year medical students' performance in case-based MEQs and multiple-choice questions (MCQs) in summative assessment in the endocrine module.
Methods: Students' scores in mid and final module MEQs and MCQs were analyzed over four successive years from 2018/2019 to 2021/2022, where comparisons were made between students' scores in MEQs and MCQs, and between scores of students of different categories.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!