In this study, conventional membrane bioreactor (MBR) and moving bed-membrane bioreactor (MB-MBR) processes were compared in synthetic textile wastewater treatment. For this purpose, the bioreactors were operated as a conventional MBR, an MB-MBR with a biocarrier filling ratio of 20 % and an MB-MBR with a biocarrier filling ratio of 10 %, respectively. In the conventional MBR operation, 93.1 % chemical oxygen demand (COD) and 87.1 % color (Reactive Red 390) removal efficiencies were obtained. In both MB-MBR operations, almost equal COD and color removal efficiencies were found as 98.5 % and 89.5 %, respectively. Moreover, offline physical and chemical membrane cleaning processes were applied every other day and every 15 days throughout the conventional MBR operation, respectively, while no physical or chemical membrane cleaning was required during both MB-MBR operations. Furthermore, lower polysaccharide concentrations of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) and floc sizes of sludge and higher zeta potential of sludge were determined in MB-MBR. Considering the obtained results, it may be stated that the MB-MBR process is an attractive treatment technology for reducing membrane fouling propensity for treatment of textile wastewater.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7511180 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2020.101631 | DOI Listing |
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int
January 2025
Viona Consulting Inc, Agro-Environmental Innovation and Technology, Research and Development Company, Thornhill, ON, L3T 0C6, Canada.
Energy from renewable resources has been growing in popularity, which ultimately helps reduce emissions of greenhouse gases (GHGs) and contaminants. Since hydrogen (H) has a higher combustion production of energy than hydrocarbon fuels, it has been identified as a clean, sustainable, and environmentally friendly energy source. There are several benefits to producing biohydrogen (bioH) from renewable sources, including lower cost and increased sustainability.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnviron Res
January 2025
Chemical Process Engineering, P.O. Box 4300, FIN-90014 University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
A low-cost and renewable magnetite-pine bark (MPB) sorbent was evaluated in continuous-flow systems for the removal of various pharmaceuticals from municipal wastewater effluent following membrane bioreactor (MBR) treatment. A 33-day small-scale column test (bed volume: 791 cm) was conducted using duplicate columns of biochar (BC, Novocarbo) and activated carbon (AC, ColorSorb) as reference for two columns of BC and MPB in order to compare the efficiency of AC and MPB. After the small-scale column test, the pharmaceutical concentrations were generally below the detection limit.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Environ Manage
December 2024
College of Resources and Environment, Chengdu University of Information Technology, Chengdu, 610225, China.
Submerged membrane bioreactor (SMBR) is a promising technology in municipal wastewater treatment, but the membrane fouling has restricted its development. In this study, an integrated submerged ceramic membrane bioreactor (C-SMBR) was constructed to treat domestic wastewater, and the characteristics of membrane fouling and the microbial community structure were investigated. The results showed that the average removal efficiencies of COD, TN, NH-N reached 94.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBioresour Technol
December 2024
Key Laboratory of the Three Gorges Reservoir Region's Eco-Environment, Ministry of Education, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400045, China. Electronic address:
Quorum sensing-regulated microbial behaviors often negatively impact wastewater treatment, leading to issues such as biofouling in membrane bioreactors, filamentous bulking, and resistance gene transfer. Quorum quenching, which counteracts quorum sensing, offers a promising strategy to mitigate these problems. This review aims to highlight overlooked perspectives for its application in microbial aggregates during wastewater treatment.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFiScience
December 2024
Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Environmental Engineering, School of Environmental and Municipal Engineering, Xi'an University Architecture and Technology, No. 13 Yanta Road, Xi'an 710055, P.R. China.
Membrane bioreactors (MBRs) are effective sewage treatment technologies, yet the differences in virus removal efficiency between aerobic (AeMBR) and anaerobic membrane bioreactors (AnMBR), remain inadequately understood. This study compared the virus removal efficiency of AeMBR and AnMBR, focusing on the interactions between aerobic (AeS) and anaerobic (AnS) activated sludge and viruses in the sewage treatment process. Results showed average log removal values (LRVs) for MS2 of 2.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!