There is very limited evidence regarding the use of prone position as part of the treatment of severe ARDS in pregnant patients. Currently, recommendations for invasive ventilatory management in this population are very scarce and are based on the extrapolation of conclusions obtained in studies of non-pregnant patients. The available literature asserts that the anatomy and physiology of the pregnant woman undergoes complex adaptive changes that must be considered during invasive ventilatory support and prone position. With prone ventilation, the benefits obtained for the couple far outweigh the eventual risks. Adequate programming of the mechanical ventilator correlates with a clear and simple concept: individualization of support. In any case, the decision on the timing of termination of pregnancy should be based on adequate multidisciplinary clinical judgment and should be supported by strict monitoring of the product.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10308227PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gine.2023.100906DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

prone position
8
invasive ventilatory
8
[prone position
4
position third
4
third trimester
4
trimester pregnancy
4
pregnancy covid-19
4
covid-19 era
4
era transdisciplinary
4
transdisciplinary approach]
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!