AI Article Synopsis

  • - Potentially traumatic events (PTEs) and substance use (SU) are common in adolescence, but the causal links between them haven't been thoroughly researched or understood, especially considering factors like genetics and demographics.
  • - The study used data from over 11,000 adolescents to track the relationship between PTEs and SU over time, adjusting for various influences that might skew results, such as age and peer behavior.
  • - Results indicated that while PTEs were associated with increased levels of substance use, particularly for alcohol and nicotine, the reverse was not true; prior substance use did not predict future PTEs, highlighting a potential one-way influence.

Article Abstract

Background: Why do potentially traumatic events (PTEs) and substance use (SU) so commonly co-occur during adolescence? Causal hypotheses developed from the study of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and substance use disorder (SUD) among adults have not yet been subject to rigorous theoretical analysis or empirical tests among adolescents with the precursors to these disorders: PTEs and SU. Establishing causality demands accounting for various factors (e.g. genetics, parent education, race/ethnicity) that distinguish youth endorsing PTEs and SU from those who do not, a step often overlooked in previous research.

Methods: We leveraged nationwide data from a sociodemographically diverse sample of youth (N = 11,468) in the Adolescent Brain and Cognitive Development Study. PTEs and substance use prevalence were assessed annually. To account for the many pre-existing differences between youth with and without PTE/SU (i.e. confounding bias) and provide rigorous tests of causal hypotheses, we linked within-person changes in PTEs and SU (alcohol, cannabis, nicotine) across repeated measurements and adjusted for time-varying factors (e.g. age, internalizing symptoms, externalizing symptoms, and friends' use of substances).

Results: Before adjusting for confounding using within-person modeling, PTEs and SU exhibited significant concurrent associations (βs = .46-1.26, ps < .05) and PTEs prospectively predicted greater SU (βs = .55-1.43, ps < .05) but not vice versa. After adjustment for confounding, the PTEs exhibited significant concurrent associations for alcohol (βs = .14-.23, ps < .05) and nicotine (βs = .16, ps < .05) but not cannabis (βs = -.01, ps > .05) and PTEs prospectively predicted greater SU (βs = .28-.55, ps > .05) but not vice versa.

Conclusions: When tested rigorously in a nationwide sample of adolescents, we find support for a model in which PTEs are followed by SU but not for a model in which SU is followed by PTEs. Explanations for why PTSD and SUD co-occur in adults may need further theoretical analysis and adaptation before extension to adolescents.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11473706PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.13985DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

traumatic events
8
co-occur adolescence?
8
ptes substance
8
causal hypotheses
8
ptes
6
substance
4
events substance
4
substance co-occur
4
adolescence? testing
4
testing three
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!