Objective In light of several advancements and considerations in endodontic dentistry, there still remains a need to comprehensively evaluate the outcome disparities between repairing and replacing broken dental restorations. This study aims to compare the effectiveness of repairing dental restorations versus replacing them, focusing on how each method affects the structural strength and longevity of the restorations. Methods The study included 60 freshly removed human maxillary premolars. Initial processing involved rigorous washing, descaling, and polishing of the teeth. To ensure preservation, the specimens were stored in sterile, distilled water. To occlude the root canals, a self-hardening composite resin was used, and the roots were coated with two coats of clear nail polish to prevent moisture penetration. A 245 carbide bur attached to a high-speed dental handpiece with air and water spray cooling produced standardized Class II cavities on the occluso-proximal surfaces. Each cavity had a buccolingual breadth of 2 mm, an occluso-cervical length of 4 mm, and a gingival boundary that was 1 mm coronal to the cement-enamel junction. Following this preparation, the teeth were randomly separated into three groups (Group A, Group B, and Group C), each containing 20 teeth. Results Our analysis showed that teeth with entirely replaced restorations had a higher average fracture resistance than those with repaired restorations. However, the difference in fracture resistance between the repair and replacement groups for each type of material was not statistically significant. Conclusion Based on the findings, repairing a dental restoration can be a conservative and less invasive alternative to a full replacement without a significant compromise in the restoration's ability to withstand fracture. Therefore, dental professionals might consider full restoration as a viable option, taking into account the need to preserve dental tissue as well as the restoration's durability and structural integrity.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11009893 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.56071 | DOI Listing |
J Dent
January 2025
Department of Biologic and Materials Sciences & Prosthodontics, University of Michigan School of Dentistry, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. Electronic address:
Objectives: To investigate the influence of different facial scanners and integration approaches on the accuracy of virtual dental patients (VDPs).
Methods: Forty VDPs were generated using a head mannequin and two facial scanners: 1) an industrial scanner and 2) a smartphone scanner. For each scanner, two integration methods were applied: 1) integration by virtual facebow scan and 2) integration by nose-teeth scan.
J Dent
January 2025
Department of Restorative, Preventive and Pediatric Dentistry, zmk bern, University of Bern, Switzerland; Unit for Practice-based Research, School of Dental Medicine, University of Bern, Switzerland. Electronic address:
Objectives: The aim of this non-interventional, multi-center, prospective, practice-based study was, firstly, to evaluate the longevity of composite build-ups in endodontically treated teeth, treated with root canal therapy (ETT), without post placement and secondly, to identify and analyze factors influencing the success of these reconstructions.
Methods: Each of seven general dental practitioners placed up to 50 composite build-ups without additional posts in ETT. Teeth were restricted to incisors, canines and premolars.
Clin Oral Investig
January 2025
School of Dentistry, Federal University of Alfenas, Rua Gabriel Monteiro da Silva, 700, Centro, Alfenas, MG, 37130-001, Brazil.
Aim: To perform a systematic review to investigate if the use of audio distraction reduces signs of stress and anxiety in paediatric patients undergoing dental treatment.
Materials And Methods: Search was made in electronic databases (MEDLINE, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, Scielo, BVS, Springer Link, Science Direct, Cochrane Library, and grey literature) until March 11th, 2024. The eligibility criteria were: paediatric patients under dental treatment; use of audio as a distraction method; comparison between groups with and without use of audio distraction; Clinical trials.
Swiss Dent J
January 2025
Division of Gerodontology and Removable Prosthodontics, University Clinics of Dental Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Due to effective preventive measures and advanced techniques in operative dentistry, tooth loss occurs later in life and implant restorations have become a common solution for replacement of missing teeth. Therefore, the use of removable dental prostheses (RDPs) is expected to decline over time. This study aims to evaluate the expected decrease in the production of RDPs in Swiss dental laboratories over the past decade.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFACS Nano
January 2025
Center for Innovation & Precision Dentistry, School of Dental Medicine, School of Engineering and Applied Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, United States.
Microrobots are poised to transform biomedicine by enabling precise, noninvasive procedures. However, current magnetic microrobots, composed of solid monolithic particles, present fundamental challenges in engineering intersubunit interactions, limiting their collective effectiveness in navigating irregular biological terrains and confined spaces. To address this, we design hierarchically assembled microrobots with multiaxis mobility and collective adaptability by engineering the potential magnetic interaction energy between subunits to create stable, self-reconfigurable structures capable of carrying and protecting cargo internally.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!