A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Epidemiology of Digital Dermatitis in Western Canadian Feedlot Cattle. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • Digital dermatitis (DD) in feedlot cattle is a growing concern, and this study analyzed over 1.2 million health records from western Canadian cattle to determine risk factors associated with the disease from 2014 to 2018.
  • Cattle sourced from confined background operations (CB) have more than double the risk (IRR = 2.08) of developing DD compared to those from auction markets (AM), while ranch direct (RD) cattle show significantly lower risk (IRR = 0.02).
  • The study found that female cattle are at a higher risk of DD than males, with varying incidences based on the year, and that smaller capacity feedlots (SCF) have a lower risk of

Article Abstract

Digital dermatitis (DD) is an emerging disease in feedlot cattle. Our objective was to identify animal- and feedlot-level risk factors for DD by analyzing individual animal health records ( = 1,209,883) and feedlot-level records from western Canadian feedlots ( = 28) between 2014 and 2018, inclusive. The risk of a DD diagnosis was higher (incidence rate ratio (IRR) = 2.08, 95% CI 1.52 to 2.86) in cattle sourced from confined background operations (CB) versus cattle sourced from auction markets (AM). Conversely, ranch direct (RD) cattle were (IRR = 0.02, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.30) lower risk than AM cattle of being diagnosed with DD. The risk of being diagnosed with DD was higher in females than in males. The magnitude of the risk in females over males was influenced by annual DD incidence in low morbidity years (2014, 2017, and 2018) (IRR = 2.02, 95% CI 1.27 to 3.19), medium morbidity years (2016) (IRR = 2.95, 95% CI 1.64 to 5.33), and high morbidity years (2015) (IRR = 5.41, 95% CI 3.27 to 8.95). At the feedlot-level, the risk of a diagnosis of DD was lower in small capacity (SCF) versus large capacity feedlots (LCF) (IRR = 0.24, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.76). Future research should focus on identifying factors that may propagate disease transmission between cattle of different sexes and from different acquisition sources.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11011063PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani14071040DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

morbidity years
12
digital dermatitis
8
western canadian
8
feedlot cattle
8
feedlot-level risk
8
risk diagnosis
8
cattle sourced
8
females males
8
cattle
7
risk
6

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!