: The introduction of endovascular thrombectomy dramatically changed acute stroke management and became the standard treatment. Balloon guide catheters provide flow arrest during the clot retrieval process and have several advantages.This study aimed to compare balloon guide catheters (BGCs) versus non-balloon guide catheters (NBGCs) as a part of a combined treatment modality in patients presenting with acute ischemic stroke. : This retrospective study included = 65 patients who underwent a combined endovascular stroke treatment for distal internal carotid artery (ICA) occlusion. Patients underwent aspiration and stent retriever thrombectomy with the use of BGCs (Group 1, = 27) or NBGCs (Group 2, = 38). : The groups were compared for outcomes: the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSSS) score change, successful recanalization, good functional outcome at three months, and in-hospital mortality. : The two groups didn't differ in terms of the NIHSS score change compared to baseline ( > 0.05). Moreover, there were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of the successful recanalization rate, three-month favorable functional outcome rate, and in-hospital mortality ( = 0.292, = 0.952, = 0.178), respectively. Further prospective studies with a larger number of patients and better methodology are warranted.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11012368PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm13071978DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

balloon guide
12
guide catheters
12
aspiration stent
8
stent retriever
8
retriever thrombectomy
8
carotid artery
8
versus non-balloon
8
non-balloon guide
8
patients underwent
8
score change
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!