A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Increased utilization of the hybrid procedure is not associated with improved early survival for newborns with hypoplastic left heart syndrome: a single-centre experience. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • - The study aimed to compare the Hybrid and Norwood procedures for treating patients with hypoplastic left heart syndrome and assess their impact on hospital mortality from 1984 to 2022.
  • - Over the years, 1,899 patients underwent the Norwood procedure while 82 had the Hybrid procedure, with Hybrid usage rising to 30% by the last analysis period, but it was linked to higher hospital mortality after adjusting for risk factors.
  • - Despite the increased adoption of the Hybrid procedure, overall mortality rates have remained stable, suggesting the need for further evaluation of the Hybrid approach in terms of its efficacy.

Article Abstract

Objectives: The primary objectives were to examine utilization of the Hybrid versus the Norwood procedure for patients with hypoplastic left heart syndrome or variants and the impact on hospital mortality. The Hybrid procedure was 1st used at our institution in 2004.

Methods: Review of all subjects undergoing the Norwood or Hybrid procedure between 1 January 1984 and 31 December 2022. The study period was divided into 8 eras: era 1, 1984-1988; era 2, 1989-1993; era 3, 1994-1998; era 4, 1999-2003; era 5, 2004-2008; era 6, 2009-2014; era 7, 2015-2018 and era 8, 2019-2022. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Mortality rates were computed using standard binomial proportions with 95% confidence intervals. Rates across eras were compared using an ordered logistic regression model with and adjusted using the Tukey-Kramer post-hoc procedure for multiple comparisons. In the risk-modelling phase, logistic regression models were specified and tested.

Results: The Norwood procedure was performed in 1899 subjects, and the Hybrid procedure in 82 subjects. Use of the Hybrid procedure increased in each subsequent era, reaching 30% of subjects in era 8. After adjustment for multiple risk factors, use of the Hybrid procedure was significantly and positively associated with hospital mortality.

Conclusions: Despite the increasing use of the Hybrid procedure, overall mortality for the entire cohort has plateaued. After adjustment for risk factors, use of the Hybrid procedure was significantly and positively associated with mortality compared to the Norwood procedure.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezae164DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

hybrid procedure
32
procedure
12
norwood procedure
12
era
10
hybrid
9
utilization hybrid
8
hypoplastic left
8
left heart
8
heart syndrome
8
logistic regression
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!