AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aims to enhance the early detection and management of frailty in elderly individuals using machine learning algorithms, ultimately improving their quality of life and reducing healthcare burdens.
  • Data from 6,997 elderly participants over several years were analyzed with four machine learning techniques to identify risk factors and develop prediction models for frailty.
  • Among the models tested, the random forest algorithm showed the highest performance with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.75, suggesting that these models can effectively assist healthcare providers in anticipating frailty risks in elderly patients.

Article Abstract

Aims: Early identification and intervention of the frailty of the elderly will help lighten the burden of social medical care and improve the quality of life of the elderly. Therefore, we used machine learning (ML) algorithm to develop models to predict frailty risk in the elderly.

Design: A prospective cohort study.

Methods: We collected data on 6997 elderly people from Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Study wave 6-7 surveys (2011-2012, 2014). After the baseline survey in 1998 (wave 1), the project conducted follow-up surveys (wave 2-8) in 2000-2018. The osteoporotic fractures index was used to assess frailty. Four ML algorithms (random forest [RF], support vector machine, XGBoost and logistic regression [LR]) were used to develop models to identify the risk factors of frailty and predict the risk of frailty. Different ML models were used for the prediction of frailty risk in the elderly and frailty risk was trained on a cohort of 4385 elderly people with frailty (split into a training cohort [75%] and internal validation cohort [25%]). The best-performing model for each study outcome was tested in an external validation cohort of 6997 elderly people with frailty pooled from the surveys (wave 6-7). Model performance was assessed by receiver operating curve and F2-score.

Results: Among the four ML models, the F2-score values were similar (0.91 vs. 0.91 vs. 0.88 vs. 0.90), and the area under the curve (AUC) values of RF model was the highest (0.75), followed by LR model (0.74). In the final two models, the AUC values of RF and LR model were similar (0.77 vs. 0.76) and their accuracy was identical (87.4% vs. 87.4%).

Conclusion: Our study developed a preliminary prediction model based on two different ML approaches to help predict frailty risk in the elderly.

Impact: The presented models from this study can be used to inform healthcare providers to predict the frailty probability among older adults and maybe help guide the development of effective frailty risk management interventions.

Implications For The Profession And/or Patient Care: Detecting frailty at an early stage and implementing timely targeted interventions may help to improve the allocation of health care resources and to reduce frailty-related burden. Identifying risk factors for frailty could be beneficial to provide tailored and personalized care intervention for older adults to more accurately prevent or improve their frail conditions so as to improve their quality of life.

Reporting Method: The study has adhered to STROBE guidelines.

Patient Or Public Contribution: No patient or public contribution.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jan.16192DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

frailty risk
24
predict frailty
16
frailty
15
elderly people
12
risk
9
machine learning
8
models predict
8
risk elderly
8
improve quality
8
develop models
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!