AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to assess a modified Health Belief Model (HBM) related to cervical cancer (CC) screening and visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) among female healthcare professionals in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, identifying factors influencing health behaviors.
  • A self-administered questionnaire with 42 items was analyzed using exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, resulting in 24 reliable items categorized into 6 factors that explain significant variance in health beliefs concerning CC and VIA.
  • With strong reliability and validity measures, the modified HBM is deemed suitable for research and clinical use by Ethiopian healthcare professionals to enhance understanding and participation in cervical cancer screenings.

Article Abstract

Purpose: Evidence supports that the Health Belief Model (HBM) can explain and predicts certain health behaviors, including participation in cervical cancer (CC) screening. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of a modified HBM for CC and visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) in female healthcare professionals in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 2020.

Methods: Psychometric properties related to CC and VIA were tested using 42-item modified HBM self-administered questionnaire and a cross-sectional study design with simple random sampling. Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin and Bartlett's sphericity test indicated that data sampling adequacy for exploratory factor analysis was 0.792 (χ2 = 3189.95, df = 351, p < .001). Items with cross-loading and factor loadings ≥ 0.5 were retained. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was conducted to determine model fit.

Results: The final analysis included 194 women, (mean age 30±4.34). Twelve items with ≤ 0.5 were removed and 30 retained items loaded into 6 factors; (benefits of VIA, perceived seriousness of CC, barrier (fear of negative outcome), self-efficacy, susceptibility to CC, and barriers (health system delivery)) explained 65% of the total variance. Cronbach's alpha for the total instrument was 0.8 and reliability for the 6 subscales was 0.76-0.92. Composite reliability and average variance extracted indicated good internal consistency and convergent validity. CFA identified 6 additional items to be removed with high residual covariance. The final 24 items of the modified HBM had an acceptable model fit (goodness-of-fit index (GFI) = 0.861, adjusted GFI = 0.823, comparative fit index = 0.937, root mean square error of approximation = 0.059).

Conclusion: The modified HBM for CC and VIA with 24 items had adequate psychometric properties and may be used by Ethiopian healthcare professionals for research or clinical purposes. To support external validity the updated 24 items tool is suggested for application in further study in different populations in Ethiopia.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11008815PMC
http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0295905PLOS

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

psychometric properties
16
modified hbm
16
healthcare professionals
12
properties modified
8
health belief
8
belief model
8
cervical cancer
8
visual inspection
8
inspection acetic
8
acetic acid
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!