A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

The word-with-noise test: test-retest reliability in normal-hearing adults. | LitMetric

The word-with-noise test: test-retest reliability in normal-hearing adults.

Codas

Universidade Federal de Santa Maria - UFSM - Santa Maria (RS), Brasil.

Published: April 2024

Purpose: To investigate the reliability of the Word-with-Noise Test in a group of normal-hearing adults.

Methods: Forty-five normal-hearing adult subjects participated in the research. The interval between the first and second assessment was 14 to 28 days, performed during the same time of the day and by the same evaluator. The comparison analysis between the test and the retest was performed considering the general result of the ears, totaling 90 ears evaluated. The inferential analysis included the comparison of the situations in the first and second assessment using the Wilcoxon Test, calculation, and interpretation of the Intraclass Correlation Index.

Results: There was a statistically significant difference between the test and retest performances. The intraclass correlation coefficients obtained were indicative of good reliability (r=0.759; p<0.001) for the monosyllabic stimulus and moderate reliability (r=0.631; p<0.001) for the disyllabic stimulus.

Conclusion: The Word-with-Noise Test demonstrated satisfactory reliability for both the monosyllabic and disyllabic stimuli.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11042685PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20232023093ptDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

word-with-noise test
8
second assessment
8
test retest
8
intraclass correlation
8
test test-retest
4
test-retest reliability
4
reliability normal-hearing
4
normal-hearing adults
4
adults purpose
4
purpose investigate
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!