AI Article Synopsis

  • This study looked at how much radiation therapy patients with oral cancer received after surgery and how it affected their quality of life.
  • They compared two groups of patients: one that had a reduced area treated with radiation and another that had standard treatments before this change.
  • The results showed that limiting radiation didn't hurt the patients' chances of staying healthy, so they want to do more studies to learn even more about it.

Article Abstract

Background And Purpose: The volume treated with postoperative radiation therapy (PORT) in patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC) is a mediator of toxicity affecting quality of life. Current guidelines only allow for very limited reduction of PORT volumes. This study investigated the safety and efficacy of de-intensified PORT for patients with OCSCC by refined compartmentalization of the treatment volume.

Materials And Methods: This retrospective cohort study identified 103 OCSCC patients treated surgically from 2014 to 2019 with a loco-regional risk profile qualifying for PORT according to guidelines. PORT was administered only to the at-risk compartment and according to a refined compartmentalization concept (CC). Oncological outcome of this CC cohort was compared to a historical cohort (HC) of 98 patients treated before the CC was implemented.

Results: Median follow-up time was 4.5 and 4.8 years in the CC and HC cohorts, respectively. In the CC cohort, a total of 72 of 103 patients (70%) had a pathological risk profile that allowed for further compartmentalization and, hence, received a reduced treatment volume or omission of PORT altogether. Loco-regional control at 3 and 5 years was 77% and 73% in the CC cohort versus 78% and 73% in the HC ( = 0.93), progression-free survival was 72% and 64% versus75% and 68% ( = 0.58), respectively. Similarly, no statistically significant difference was seen in other outcome measures.

Conclusions: De-intensified PORT limiting the treatment volume to the at-risk compartment or avoiding PORT altogether for low-risk patients with OCSCC does not seem to compromise disease control in this retrospective comparison. Based on these hypothesis-generating findings, a prospective study is being planned.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10999524PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2024.1362025DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

oral cavity
8
cavity squamous
8
squamous cell
8
cell carcinoma
8
port
8
port patients
8
de-intensified port
8
patients ocscc
8
refined compartmentalization
8
patients treated
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!