Interpreting Wide-Complex Tachycardia With the Use of Artificial Intelligence.

Can J Cardiol

Harry Perkins Institute of Medical Research, University of Western Australia, Murdoch, Western Australia, Australia; Department of Cardiology, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Murdoch, Western Australia, Australia.

Published: October 2024

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study developed an AI algorithm to interpret wide-complex tachycardia (WCT) electrocardiograms (ECGs) and compared its diagnostic accuracy to cardiologists, showing promising results in improving diagnosis speed and accuracy.
  • Electrophysiology (EP) cardiologists achieved a mean accuracy of 92.5% in diagnosing ECGs, while non-EP cardiologists had an accuracy of only 73.2%. The AI performed similarly to EP cardiologists, with an accuracy of 93.0% and faster interpretation times.
  • The findings suggest that incorporating AI into ECG interpretation could enhance the diagnostic process and ultimately lead to better patient care.

Article Abstract

Background: Adopting artificial intelligence (AI) in medicine may improve speed and accuracy in patient diagnosis. We sought to develop an AI algorithm to interpret wide-complex tachycardia (WCT) electrocardiograms (ECGs) and compare its diagnostic accuracy with that of cardiologists.

Methods: Using 3330 WCT ECGs (2906 supraventricular tachycardia [SVT] and 424 ventricular tachycardia [VT]), we created a training/validation (3131) and a test set (199 ECGs). A convolutional neural network structure using a modification of differentiable architecture search was developed to differentiate between SVT and VT.

Results: The mean accuracy of electrophysiology (EP) cardiologists was 92.5% with sensitivity 91.7%, specificity 93.4%, positive predictive value 93.7%, and negative predictive value 91.7%. Non-EP cardiologists had an accuracy of 73.2 ± 14.4% with sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of 59.8 ± 18.2%, 93.8 ± 3.7%, 93.6 ± 2.3%, and 73.2 ± 14.4%, respectively. AI had superior sensitivity and accuracy (91.9% and 93.0%, respectively) than non-EP cardiologists and similar performance compared with EP cardiologists. Mean time to interpret each ECG varied from 10.1 to 13.8 seconds for EP cardiologists and from 3.1 to 16.6 seconds for non-EP cardiologists. AI required a mean of 0.0092 ± 0.0035 seconds for each ECG interpretation.

Conclusions: AI appears to diagnose WCT with accuracy superior to non-EP cardiologists and similar to EP cardiologists. Using AI to assist with ECG interpretations may improve patient care.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cjca.2024.03.027DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

non-ep cardiologists
16
wide-complex tachycardia
8
artificial intelligence
8
cardiologists
8
negative predictive
8
732 144%
8
accuracy
6
interpreting wide-complex
4
tachycardia
4
tachycardia artificial
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!