AI Article Synopsis

  • The study investigates the effectiveness of intrathecal fluorescein (ITF) for detecting cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks during endoscopic skull base surgery, highlighting its role in achieving watertight seals.
  • A meta-analysis of 14 studies showed that ITF was used successfully in 90.3% of patients, with an overall detection rate of 88.1% for leaks, though it was not significantly better than other imaging tests.
  • While ITF is effective in locating defects, around 60% of patients experienced complications, indicating that careful patient selection is crucial for its use.

Article Abstract

Purpose: The intraoperative detection of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks during endoscopic skull base surgery is critical to ensure watertight sealed defects. Intrathecal fluorescein (ITF) is a valuable adjunct to intraoperative investigation. Hence, our aim is to summarize the evidence of the efficacy of ITF as an accurate diagnostic modality and reconstruction guide for non-congenital skull base defects.

Methods: Using the Cochrane Central, MEDLINE, and Embase databases, we identified studies involving the use of ITF in non-congenital CSF leaks which were published until November 2023. The STATA 18 software was used for meta-analysis.

Results: Fourteen studies met the inclusion criteria, in which seven studies were included in the meta-analysis. ITF was used in 1898 (90.3%) of patients, with a detection rate of 88.1%. The overall detection rate of non-congenital CSF leaks among ITF concentrations of 5% and 10% had a statistically significant pooled effect size of 2.6 (95% CI = 2.25, 2.95), while when comparing the ITF to other alternative radiological tests, it was not statistically significant with a mean difference of 0.88 (95% CI = - 0.4, 2.16). Moreover, the pooled prevalence was statistically significant in regards of the complications associated with ITF with an effect size of 0.6 (95% CI = 0.39, 0.82), indicating that 60% of patients who underwent ITF would experience at least one of the measured complications.

Conclusion: ITF is considered as an efficient tool in localizing skull base defects. However, there was no significant results when comparing the ITF to other alternative radiological tests. Accordingly, if the ITF intervention is indicated, patients should be carefully selected based on their clinical need.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11392968PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-024-08603-2DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

skull base
16
csf leaks
12
itf
11
intrathecal fluorescein
8
non-congenital skull
8
base defects
8
non-congenital csf
8
detection rate
8
size 95%
8
comparing itf
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!