The Effect and Influence of the Responsibility System Rehabilitation Nursing Model in the Nursing of Patients with Ischemic Stroke.

Objective: To explore and evaluate the effect of the accountability rehabilitation nursing model in the care of patients with ischemic stroke and the impact on nursing satisfaction, in order to improve the quality of care for patients with ischemic stroke.

Design: This study selected 92 patients with ischemic stroke who met the inclusion criteria as the study objects, and divided them equally into the control group (46 cases) and the research group (46 cases) using a random number table. Data were collected by questionnaire.

Interventions: The control group received standard routine rehabilitation nursing care, while the study group underwent an accountable rehabilitation care model. In the accountable rehabilitation care model, distinct nursing practices and strategies were employed to enhance clinical outcomes, limb function, neurological function, quality of life, and nursing satisfaction. Key elements of this model may include personalized care plans, increased emphasis on patient engagement, targeted therapeutic interventions, and a systematic approach to care coordination. A comparative analysis was conducted before and after the intervention to highlight the nuanced differences in outcomes between the two groups, shedding light on the specific benefits and effectiveness of the accountable rehabilitation care model as opposed to routine rehabilitation care.

Results: In terms of clinical outcomes, the ESS score of the study group after intervention was significantly higher than that of the control group, indicating a positive impact on overall health (P < .05); limb function assessed by upper and lower limb muscle strength scores improved in both groups after the intervention. There was a significant enhancement, in which the score of the study group was significantly higher than that of the control group (P < .05); the NIHSS score showed that compared with the control group, the neurological function of the study group was significantly improved (P < .05); the SS-QOL score was used The assessed quality of life also improved significantly in the study group, exceeding the scores in the control group (P < .05). In addition, the nursing satisfaction of the study group was significantly higher compared with the control group, which highlighted the positive acceptance of the responsible rehabilitation nursing model by nursing staff (P < .05). Together, these findings highlight the combined benefits of the intervention in enhancing clinical, functional, and subjective outcomes.

Discussion: The study underscores the promising clinical benefits of the responsibility system rehabilitation nursing model for patients with ischemic stroke. Marked enhancements in clinical outcomes, limb and nerve function, quality of life, and nursing satisfaction indicate its potential to significantly improve patient care. The personalized and accountable approach, featuring tailored care plans and heightened emphasis on patient engagement, holds promise for fostering positive health outcomes and enhancing overall patient experiences. Integrating this model into routine stroke care protocols emerges as a pivotal strategy for optimizing rehabilitation processes and adopting a patient-centered approach. Despite these advantages, acknowledging study limitations, such as non-randomized participant allocation and the absence of blinding, is crucial to recognizing potential biases. The study's sample size and single-center focus may impact generalizability. Beyond ischemic stroke, the model's broader significance aligns with contemporary healthcare trends, emphasizing accountability, personalized care plans, and enhanced care coordination. Its potential adaptation to various healthcare settings, chronic disease management, and preventive care could contribute to improved patient outcomes and healthcare quality. Future research should explore scalability and sustainability across diverse healthcare settings, investigating applicability to different patient populations and medical conditions. Assessing long-term effects, including healthcare cost-effectiveness and patient adherence, is essential for a comprehensive understanding of impact. Furthermore, delving into the perspectives of healthcare providers and patients can refine and tailor implementation strategies for optimal outcomes.

Results: After the intervention, The European Stroke Scale (ESS) score of the study group was higher than that of the control group. After the intervention, the muscle strength scores of the upper and lower limbs of the study group were significantly higher than those of the control group. After intervention, the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score of the study group was lower than that of the control group. After intervention, the stroke-specific quality of life scale (SS-QOL) score of the study group was higher than that of the control group. The nursing satisfaction of the study group was higher than that of the control group after intervention (all P < .05).

Conclusion: The results of the study showed that the responsibility system rehabilitation nursing mode showed significant effects in improving the limb function, neurological function and quality of life of patients with ischemic stroke, which could promote the disease outcome of patients, and the nursing satisfaction of patients was high, which was worthy of promotion.