Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Objective: Severe infections can lead to neuromyopathy in critically ill patients, resulting in limb weakness and difficulty in weaning from a ventilator. This study aims to assess the electrophysiological test results in patients with severe infection and their correlation with severity scores (APACHE II and SOFA).
Methods: Thirty-one patients with severe infection in the EICU were prospectively studied. Factor analysis and principal component regression were applied to develop linear models of electrophysiological diagnostic outcomes with APACHE II and SOFA scores for the entire patient cohort, the younger group (age<55) cohort, and the older group (age>55) cohort of patients with severe infections, respectively.
Results: Among patients with a severe infection in the EICU, the proportion of patients without critical neuromyopathy with more than 50% F-wave presence in the median, ulnar, and tibial nerves (64.9%, 56.8%, 48.6%, respectively) was significantly higher than in the group with critical neuromyopathy (52.1%, 35.4%, 29.2%, respectively.), and the proportion of patients with critical neuromyopathy who did not elicit the three types of F wave was significantly higher in the cohort of patients with critical neuromyopathy (40.5%, 32.4%, 35.1%, respectively.) were significantly higher than in the cohort of patients without critical illness (18.8%, 12.5%, 20.8%, respectively). In addition, on average, patients with critical neuromyopathy had a much lower CMAP for the median nerve (wrist, elbow) (2.4, 1.88, respectively) (4.3, 3.9, respectively in undiagnosed cohort), ulnar nerve (wrist, elbow) (2.4, 1.88, respectively) (5.65, 5.4, respectively in undiagnosed cohort), and tibial nerve(ankle, popliteal fossa) (2.7, 1.57, respectively)(6.55, 5.3, respectively in undiagnosed cohort) nerves than patients without critical neuromyopathy, and showed more non-elicitation, which was not seen in the cohort of patients without critical neuromyopathy. The CMAP returned to normal in the cohort of patients without critical neuromyopathy. Therefore, with respect to our selected electrophysiological parameters, the two patient groups showed significant differences in terms of the specific values and statistical analysis (Table 1). Through factor analysis and principal component regression, we found that CMAP and F-wave were highly correlated with APACHE II and SOFA scores, and the correlation between the electrophysiological wave spectrum and the two scores was further quantified by principal component regression.
Conclusion: Electrophysiological spectroscopy can serve as an early warning for the development of neuromuscular disease in EICU patients. Abnormal electrophysiological diagnosis prior to actual neuromuscular abnormalities and its subsequent return to normal can help identify high-risk patients and implement early interventions.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!