https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/efetch.fcgi?db=pubmed&id=38581132&retmode=xml&tool=Litmetric&email=readroberts32@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09 385811322024073020240801
2055-58221142024AugESC heart failureESC Heart FailAchieved dose and treatment discontinuation of candesartan in men and women with chronic heart failure: data from CHARM.188018871880-188710.1002/ehf2.14715Angiotensin receptor blockers have been shown to reduce heart failure hospitalization and cardiovascular mortality in men and women with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). It is unknown whether there are differences between men and women in achieved dose and treatment discontinuation due to adverse events of candesartan.We conducted a post hoc analysis of the Candesartan in Heart failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM) programme. A total of 3172 men and 1106 women with HFrEF [left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 40%] in New York Heart Association class II-IV were randomized to candesartan or placebo. Every 2 weeks, patients were up-titrated from 4 or 8, to16, to 32 mg once daily, unless a higher dose was contraindicated or not tolerated. Women were older (66 vs. 64 years), had a higher LVEF (29.9% vs. 28.6%), and had more hypertension (54% vs. 47%) than men. The mean achieved dose of candesartan was 21.5 ± 12.6 mg in men and 20.7 ± 12.9 mg in women (P = 0.19). In both the candesartan and placebo groups, cardiovascular death and heart failure hospitalizations were higher in men and women who achieved lower dose levels. Event rates for achieved dose levels of 0, 4 or 8, 16, and 32 mg candesartan were 20.8, 17.2, 14.0, and 10.1 per 100 person-years in men, respectively, and 23.6, 13.7, 14.0, and 9.1 per 100 person-years in women, respectively. In each of the achieved dose levels, there was no sex difference in the proportion of patients with an event, neither in the candesartan group nor in the placebo group (P-value for all > 0.05). There was no significant interaction between sex and treatment-related discontinuation for hypotension (P = 0.520), an increase in creatinine (P = 0.102), and hyperkalaemia (P = 0.905).In a randomized clinical trial in patients with HFrEF, men and women achieved similar doses of candesartan. Primary event rates and treatment-related discontinuation due to adverse events were also similar between men and women.© 2024 The Authors. ESC Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society of Cardiology.QinHailunHDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, The Netherlands.DewanPoojaPBritish Heart Foundation Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.SantemaBernadet TBTDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, The Netherlands.Ter MaatenJozine MJMDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, The Netherlands.SwedbergKarlKDepartment of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.McMurrayJohn J VJJVBritish Heart Foundation Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.VoorsAdriaan AAADepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, The Netherlands.eng202008440347China Scholarship Council and University Medical Centre GroningenJournal ArticleRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study20240405
EnglandESC Heart Fail1016691912055-58220Biphenyl CompoundsS8Q36MD2XXcandesartan0Tetrazoles0Benzimidazoles0Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor BlockersIMHumansBiphenyl CompoundsFemaleTetrazolesadministration & dosageMaleHeart Failuredrug therapyphysiopathologyAgedBenzimidazolesadministration & dosagetherapeutic useMiddle AgedStroke VolumephysiologyDose-Response Relationship, DrugAngiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockersadministration & dosagetherapeutic useTreatment OutcomeDouble-Blind MethodVentricular Function, Leftphysiologydrug effectsFollow-Up StudiesWithholding TreatmentSex FactorsChronic DiseaseCandesartanDrug doseHeart failureSexWomenJ.J.V.M. reports payments through Glasgow University from work on clinical trials; consulting and other activities from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Cardurion, Cytokinetics, GSK, KBP Biosciences, and Novartis; personal consultancy fees from Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Bayer, BMS, George Clinical Pty Ltd., Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, and River 2 Renal Corporation; and personal lecture fees from Abbott, Alkem Metabolics, AstraZeneca, Blue Ocean Scientific Solutions Ltd., Boehringer Ingelheim, Canadian Medical and Surgical Knowledge, Emcure Pharmaceuticals Ltd., Eris Lifesciences, European Academy of CME, Hikma Pharmaceuticals, Imagica Health, Intas Pharmaceuticals, J.B. Chemicals & Pharma Ltd., Luptin Pharma, Medscape/Heart.Org, ProAdWise Communications, Radcliffe Cardiology, Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., The Corpus, Translation Research Group, and Translational Medicine Academy. He is a director of Global Clinical Trial Partners Ltd. A.A.V. has received consultancy fees and research contracts from AnaCardio, AstraZeneca, BMS, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Corteria, Eli Lilly, Salubrio, Merck, Moderna, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, and Roche Diagnostics. The other authors declare no conflicts of interest.
202411120231052024118202473012422024461744202446143202445ppublish38581132PMC1128736710.1002/ehf2.14715McDonagh TA, Metra M, Adamo M, Gardner RS, Baumbach A, Böhm M, et al. 2021 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure. Eur Heart J 2021;42:3599‐3726. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehab36810.1093/eurheartj/ehab36834447992McDonagh TA, Metra M, Adamo M, Gardner RS, Baumbach A, Böhm M, et al. 2023 focused update of the 2021 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure. Eur Heart J 2023;44:3627‐3639. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehad19510.1093/eurheartj/ehad19537622666Heidenreich PA, Bozkurt B, Aguilar D, Allen LA, Byun JJ, Colvin MM, et al. 2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA guideline for the management of heart failure: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation 2022;145:895‐1032. doi:10.1161/CIR.000000000000106310.1161/CIR.000000000000106335363499Soldin OP, Mattison DR. Sex differences in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Clin Pharmacokinet 2009;48:143‐157. doi:10.2165/00003088-200948030-0000110.2165/00003088-200948030-00001PMC364455119385708Tamargo J, Rosano G, Walther T, Duarte J, Niessner A, Kaski JC, et al. Gender differences in the effects of cardiovascular drugs. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother 2017;3:163‐182. doi:10.1093/ehjcvp/pvw04210.1093/ehjcvp/pvw04228329228Gan L, Langenickel T, Petruck J, Kode K, Rajman I, Chandra P, et al. Effects of age and sex on the pharmacokinetics of LCZ696, an angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor. J Clin Pharmacol 2016;56:78‐86. doi:10.1002/jcph.57110.1002/jcph.57126073563Brunner HR. The new angiotensin II receptor antagonist, irbesartan: Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic considerations. Am J Hypertens 1997;10:311S‐317S. doi:10.1016/s0895-7061(97)00391-910.1016/s0895-7061(97)00391-99438775Massana E, Barbanoj MJ, Moros C, Morte A, Gich I, Jané F. No sex‐related pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic differences of captopril. Pharmacol Res 1997;36:41‐47. doi:10.1006/phrs.1997.020210.1006/phrs.1997.02029368913Saenz‐Campos D, Bayes MC, Masana E, Martín S, Barbanoj M, Jané F. Sex‐related pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic variations of lisinopril. Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol 1996;18:533‐538.9044242Wing LM, Reid CM, Ryan P, Beilin LJ, Brown MA, Jennings GL, et al. A comparison of outcomes with angiotensin‐converting‐enzyme inhibitors and diuretics for hypertension in the elderly. N Engl J Med 2003;348:583‐592. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa02171610.1056/NEJMoa02171612584366Rathore SS, Wang Y, Krumholz HM. Sex‐based differences in the effect of digoxin for the treatment of heart failure. N Engl J Med 2002;347:1403‐1411. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa02126610.1056/NEJMoa02126612409542Fletcher A, Beevers DG, Bulpitt C, Butler A, Coles EC, Hunt D, et al. Beta adrenoceptor blockade is associated with increased survival in male but not female hypertensive patients: A report from the DHSS Hypertension Care Computing Project (DHCCP). J Hum Hypertens 1988;2:219‐227.2907053Luzier AB, Killian A, Wilton JH, Wilson MF, Forrest A, Kazierad DJ. Gender‐related effects on metoprolol pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in healthy volunteers. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1999;66:594‐601. doi:10.1053/cp.1999.v66.10340000110.1053/cp.1999.v66.10340000110613615Walle T, Walle UK, Cowart TD, Conradi EC. Pathway‐selective sex differences in the metabolic clearance of propranolol in human subjects. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1989;46:257‐263. doi:10.1038/clpt.1989.13610.1038/clpt.1989.1362776391Gilmore DA, Gal J, Gerber JG, Nies AS. Age and gender influence the stereoselective pharmacokinetics of propranolol. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1992;261:1181‐1186.1602383Zapater P, Novalbos J, Gallego‐Sandin S, Hernandez FT, Abad‐Santos F. Gender differences in angiotensin‐converting enzyme (ACE) activity and inhibition by enalaprilat in healthy volunteers. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 2004;43:737‐744. doi:10.1097/00005344-200405000-0001810.1097/00005344-200405000-0001815071363McIntyre M, Caffe SE, Michalak RA, Reid JL. Losartan, an orally active angiotensin (AT1) receptor antagonist: A review of its efficacy and safety in essential hypertension. Pharmacol Ther 1997;74:181‐194. doi:10.1016/s0163-7258(97)82002-510.1016/s0163-7258(97)82002-59336021Granger CB, McMurray JJ, Yusuf S, Held P, Michelson EL, Olofsson B, et al. Effects of candesartan in patients with chronic heart failure and reduced left‐ventricular systolic function intolerant to angiotensin‐converting‐enzyme inhibitors: The CHARM‐Alternative trial. Lancet 2003;362:772‐776. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14284-510.1016/S0140-6736(03)14284-513678870McMurray JJ, Ostergren J, Swedberg K, Granger CB, Held P, Michelson EL, et al. Effects of candesartan in patients with chronic heart failure and reduced left‐ventricular systolic function taking angiotensin‐converting‐enzyme inhibitors: The CHARM‐Added trial. Lancet 2003;362:767‐771. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14283-310.1016/S0140-6736(03)14283-313678869Swedberg K, Pfeffer M, Granger C, McMurray J, Ohlin G, Olofsson B, et al. Candesartan in heart failure—Assessment of reduction in mortality and morbidity (CHARM): Rationale and design. Charm‐Programme Investigators. J Card Fail 1999;5:276‐282. doi:10.1016/s1071-9164(99)90013-110.1016/s1071-9164(99)90013-110496201Bots SH, Onland‐Moret NC, Tulevski II, van der Harst P, Cramer MJM, Asselbergs FW, et al. Heart failure medication dosage and survival in women and men seen at outpatient clinics. Heart 2021;107:1748‐1755. doi:10.1136/heartjnl-2021-31922910.1136/heartjnl-2021-319229PMC852245334261736Santema BT, Ouwerkerk W, Tromp J, Sama IE, Ravera A, Regitz‐Zagrosek V, et al. Identifying optimal doses of heart failure medications in men compared with women: A prospective, observational, cohort study. Lancet 2019;394:1254‐1263. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31792-110.1016/S0140-6736(19)31792-131447116Cerlinskaite‐Bajore K, Lam CSP, Sliwa K, Adamo M, Ter Maaten JM, Léopold V, et al. Sex‐specific analysis of the rapid up‐titration of guideline‐directed medical therapies after a hospitalization for acute heart failure: Insights from the STRONG‐HF trial. Eur J Heart Fail 2023;25:1156‐1165. doi:10.1002/ejhf.288210.1002/ejhf.288237191154McMurray JJV, Jackson AM, Lam CSP, Redfield MM, Anand IS, Ge J. Effects of sacubitril‐valsartan versus valsartan in women compared with men with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction: Insights from PARAGON‐HF. Circulation 2020;141:338‐351. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.04449110.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.04449131736337Berg DD, Braunwald E, DeVore AD, Lala A, Pinney SP, Duffy CI, et al. Efficacy and safety of sacubitril/valsartan by dose level achieved in the PIONEER‐HF trial. JACC Heart Fail 2020;8:834‐843. doi:10.1016/j.jchf.2020.06.00810.1016/j.jchf.2020.06.008PMC754158632800511Wikstrand J, Hjalmarson A, Waagstein F, Fagerberg B, Goldstein S, Kjekshus J, et al. Dose of metoprolol CR/XL and clinical outcomes in patients with heart failure: Analysis of the experience in metoprolol CR/XL randomized intervention trial in chronic heart failure (MERIT‐HF). J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;40:491‐498. doi:10.1016/s0735-1097(02)01970-810.1016/s0735-1097(02)01970-812142116Harris RZ, Benet LZ, Schwartz JB. Gender effects in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Drugs 1995;50:222‐239. doi:10.2165/00003495-199550020-0000310.2165/00003495-199550020-000038521756Hirvensalo P, Tornio A, Launiainen T, Paile‐Hyvärinen M, Tapaninen T, Neuvonen M, et al. UGT1A3 and sex are major determinants of telmisartan pharmacokinetics—A comprehensive pharmacogenomic study. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2020;108:885‐895. doi:10.1002/cpt.192810.1002/cpt.192832498119Cabaleiro T, Roman M, Ochoa D, Talegón M, Prieto‐Pérez R, Wojnicz A, et al. Evaluation of the relationship between sex, polymorphisms in CYP2C8 and CYP2C9, and pharmacokinetics of angiotensin receptor blockers. Drug Metab Dispos 2013;41:224‐229. doi:10.1124/dmd.112.04629210.1124/dmd.112.04629223118328Marino MR, Vachharajani NN. Pharmacokinetics of irbesartan are not altered in special populations. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 2002;40:112‐122. doi:10.1097/00005344-200207000-0001410.1097/00005344-200207000-0001412072584Israili ZH. Clinical pharmacokinetics of angiotensin II (AT1) receptor blockers in hypertension. J Hum Hypertens 2000;14:S73‐S86. doi:10.1038/sj.jhh.100099110.1038/sj.jhh.100099110854085McClellan KJ, Goa KL. Candesartan cilexetil: A review of its use in essential hypertension. Drugs 1998;56:847‐869. doi:10.2165/00003495-199856050-0001310.2165/00003495-199856050-000139829158Easthope SE, Jarvis B. Candesartan cilexetil: An update of its use in essential hypertension. Drugs 2002;62:1253‐1287. doi:10.2165/00003495-200262080-0001610.2165/00003495-200262080-0001612010090Regitz‐Zagrosek V. Therapeutic implications of the gender‐specific aspects of cardiovascular disease. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2006;5:425‐438. doi:10.1038/nrd203210.1038/nrd203216672926Vardeny O, Claggett B, Packer M, Zile MR, Rouleau J, Swedberg K, et al. Efficacy of sacubitril/valsartan vs. enalapril at lower than target doses in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: The PARADIGM‐HF trial. Eur J Heart Fail 2016;18:1228‐1234. doi:10.1002/ejhf.58010.1002/ejhf.580PMC509578427283779Swat SA, Helmkamp LJ, Tietbohl C, Thompson JS, Fitzgerald M, McIlvennan CK, et al. Clinical inertia among outpatients with heart failure: Application of treatment nonintensification taxonomy to EPIC‐HF trial. JACC Heart Fail 2023;11:1579‐1591. doi:10.1016/j.jchf.2023.06.02210.1016/j.jchf.2023.06.02237589610Ferreira JP, Konstam MA, McMurray JJV, Butler J, Girerd N, Rossignol P, et al. Dosing of losartan in men versus women with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: The HEAAL trial. Eur J Heart Fail 2021;23:1477‐1484. doi:10.1002/ejhf.225510.1002/ejhf.225534050594Savarese G, Bodegard J, Norhammar A, Sartipy P, Thuresson M, Cowie MR, et al. Heart failure drug titration, discontinuation, mortality and heart failure hospitalization risk: A multinational observational study (US, UK and Sweden). Eur J Heart Fail 2021;23:1499‐1511. doi:10.1002/ejhf.227110.1002/ejhf.227134132001Chioncel O, Lainscak M, Seferovic PM, Anker SD, Crespo‐Leiro MG, Harjola VP, et al. Epidemiology and one‐year outcomes in patients with chronic heart failure and preserved, mid‐range and reduced ejection fraction: An analysis of the ESC Heart Failure Long‐Term Registry. Eur J Heart Fail 2017;19:1574‐1585. doi:10.1002/ejhf.81310.1002/ejhf.81328386917Yusuf S, Pfeffer MA, Swedberg K, Granger CB, Held P, McMurray JJV, et al. Effects of candesartan in patients with chronic heart failure and preserved left‐ventricular ejection fraction: The CHARM‐Preserved trial. Lancet 2003;362:777‐781. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14285-710.1016/S0140-6736(03)14285-713678871