Who gets screened and who tests positive? Drug screening among justice-involved youth in a midwestern urban county.

Health Justice

Department of Pediatrics, Section of Adolescent Medicine, Adolescent Behavioral Health Research Program, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.

Published: April 2024

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study investigates the factors that influence which justice-involved youth are selected for drug screening (DS) while on probation, analyzing data from over 4,600 cases in a midwestern county.
  • Findings reveal that males are more likely to be screened and to test positive for substance use, while older youth are less likely to be assigned to DS; also, a higher number of charges increases the likelihood of screening.
  • The research concludes that demographic and charge-based criteria for assigning DS may not be effective, as they do not consistently correlate with the results of the screenings.

Article Abstract

Background: Given high rates of substance use among justice-involved youth, justice systems have attempted to monitor use through drug screening (DS) procedures. However, there is discretion in deciding who is screened for substance use, as not every youth who encounters the system is screened. The aim of the current study was to examine factors associated with selection for and results of oral DS among justice-involved youth assigned to probation to better inform potential DS policy. Electronic court records from 4,668 youth with first-incident records assigned to probation in a midwestern urban county's juvenile justice system between 2011 and 2016 were included in the analytical sample. Race/ethnicity, gender, age, number of charges and charge type for the current incident were included as independent variables.

Results: Multivariable hierarchical logistic regression analyses indicated that males were more likely to be assigned to DS (aOR = 0.40, 95%CI [0.34, 0.46]), and more likely to test positive for use (aOR = 0.43, 95% CI [0.34, 0.54]) than females. As age increased, youth were less likely to be assigned to DS (aOR = 0.91, 95% CI [0.87, 0.94]), with non-significant differences in DS results. Greater number of charges were associated with a higher likelihood of being assigned to DS (aOR = 1.55, 95% CI [1.43, 1.68]). Youth with violent offenses were more likely to be assigned to DS than those with other offense types (property offenses, drug offenses, statutory offenses, disorderly conduct, and all other offenses), but less likely to test positive for use.

Conclusions: Many factors were associated with differences in DS, but these factors were not always associated with differential DS results. Demographic or charge-based decisions may not be appropriate for DS assignment.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10997690PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40352-024-00273-wDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

justice-involved youth
12
factors associated
12
drug screening
8
midwestern urban
8
youth assigned
8
assigned probation
8
number charges
8
test positive
8
youth
7
assigned
6

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!