Introduction: The routine use of pneumatic tourniquets in orthopaedic surgery is widely adopted in current practice; however, practice varies considerably based mainly on anecdotal and cultural traditions. This Quality Improvement Project evaluated current service as per the newly published British Orthopaedic Association Standards for Trauma & Orthopaedics guideline on 'The Safe Use of Intraoperative Tourniquets'.
Methods: Patient records were reviewed retrospectively for all patients who underwent orthopaedic surgery in September 2021 at one NHS hospital trust. Simultaneously, a nine-question survey was distributed to the orthopaedic teams allowing assessment of non-quantifiable aspects of the guidelines. The results were delivered as a local presentation, and trust-wide dissemination of posters using the mnemonic 'PRESSURE' was used to educate staff. The quantitative audit was repeated twice, after this intervention (March 2022) and after the advent of a new electronic patient record system with an online proforma (January 2023).
Results: There was significant improvement (<0.05) in all aspects of tourniquet documentation between the audit cycles. Maximum advised tourniquet duration was exceeded in <2% of cases regardless of guideline publication. Recommended pressures were used in less than one-third of cases in all audit cycles, with no significant change throughout. More than 50% of respondents sized their tourniquet on 'whatever looked best fit'.
Conclusions: Despite tourniquet usage being part of the UK Trauma & Orthopaedic Surgery curriculum, this study is the first to highlight a lack of compliance with 'gold standard' guidelines and the need for increased training for staff to ensure patients are exposed to the safest possible environment. Although electronic proformas can aid recording of information, the limitation to change is cultural tradition and anecdotal experience.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1308/rcsann.2023.0072 | DOI Listing |
Int Orthop
January 2025
MSk Lab, Imperial College London, London, W12 0BZ, UK.
Purpose: Trauma and orthopaedic (T&O) surgery relies on medical implants and materials, often resulting in metalwork wastage (prosthesis, screws, nails, and plates). This places an economic strain on healthcare services and the environment. Our primary outcome is to quantify the implant wastage across the literature, and secondarily investigate the associated costs in this specialty.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFOrthop Surg
January 2025
Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Varus posteromedial rotatory instability (VPMRI) of the elbow is one of the complex elbow instability. The primary sites of injury encompass fractures of the anteromedial coronoid process and injuries to the lateral collateral ligament of the elbow. Some patients may present with involvement of the medial collateral ligament of the elbow.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAm J Sports Med
January 2025
Campbell Clinic Orthopedics, Germantown, Tennessee, USA.
Background: While allografts are commonly used for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), evidence to guide specific allograft selection is lacking.
Purpose: To compare clinical and graft failure rates after ACLR using soft tissue-only allografts and bone-soft tissue allografts in adults.
Study Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 4.
Am J Sports Med
January 2025
Department of Orthopaedics, A. Gemelli University Hospital Foundation IRCCS, Catholic University, Rome, Italy.
Background: Failure, persistent knee instability, and reinjury rates after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction are still concerns. Biomechanical investigations have highlighted the role of the anterolateral ligament (ALL) as a crucial knee stabilizer, and clinical outcomes after combined ACL and ALL reconstruction appear to indicate the success of the procedure.
Purpose: To compare the functional outcomes, return-to-sport (RTS) rate, and complications between combined ACL and ALL reconstruction and isolated ACL reconstruction.
Am J Sports Med
January 2025
Department of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Background: The Minimum Information for Studies Evaluating Biologics in Orthopedics (MIBO) guidelines were developed in May 2017 to encourage improved reporting standards, promote increased transparency and reproducibility, and enhance clinical evaluation capabilities. The MIBO guidelines consist of 23 checklist items considered necessary to critically appraise clinical studies evaluating platelet-rich plasma (PRP).
Purpose: To assess randomized controlled trials that evaluated PRP for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis in order to systematically review their adherence to the MIBO guidelines.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!