AI Article Synopsis

  • Endoscopic mucosal dissection (ESD) is a common treatment for early gastric cancer, but it can lead to post-ESD ulcers in 4.4% of patients; this study examines whether PuraStat, a new hemostatic solution, can prevent related bleeding.
  • The research involved 101 patients who received PuraStat after ESD and compared them to a control group of 297 patients; results showed similar bleeding rates between both groups, with PuraStat not significantly reducing post-ESD bleeding.
  • Despite PuraStat not being linked to reduced bleeding, factors like larger resection sizes and anticoagulant use increased the risk of bleeding after ESD, indicating other underlying influences on the treatment

Article Abstract

Background: Endoscopic mucosal dissection has become the standard treatment for early gastric cancer. However, post-endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) ulcer occurs in 4.4% of patients. This study hypothesized whether applying PuraStat, a novel hemostatic peptide solution, prevents post-ESD bleeding.

Aim: To investigate the preventive potential of PuraStat, a hemostatic formulation, against bleeding in post-ESD gastric ulcers.

Methods: Between May 2022 and March 2023, 101 patients (Group P) underwent ESD for gastric diseases at our hospital and received PuraStat (2 mL) for post-ESD ulcers. We retrospectively compared this group with a control group (Group C) comprising 297 patients who underwent ESD for gastric diseases at our hospital between April 2017 and March 2021. values < 0.05 on two-sided tests indicated significance.

Results: Post-ESD bleeding occurred in 6 (5.9%) (95%CI: 2.8-12.4) and 20 (6.7%) (95%CI: 4.4-10.2) patients in Groups P and C, respectively, with no significant between-group difference. The relative risk was 1.01 (95%CI: 0.95-1.07). The lesser curvature or anterior wall was the bleeding site in all 6 patients who experienced postoperative bleeding in Group P. In multivariate analysis, the odds ratios for resection diameter ≥ 50 mm and oral anticoagulant use were 6.63 (95%CI: 2.52-14.47; = 0.0001) and 4.04 (1.26-0.69; = 0.0164), respectively. The adjusted odds ratio of post-ESD bleeding and PuraStat was 1.28 (95%CI: 0.28-2.15).

Conclusion: PuraStat application is not associated with post-ESD bleeding. However, the study suggests that gravitational forces may affect the effectiveness of applied PuraStat.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10989251PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v16.i3.168DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

post-esd bleeding
12
novel hemostatic
8
hemostatic peptide
8
peptide solution
8
submucosal dissection
8
underwent esd
8
esd gastric
8
gastric diseases
8
diseases hospital
8
bleeding
7

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!