Importance: Lack of respectful maternity care may be a key factor associated with disparities in maternal health. However, mistreatment during childbirth has not been widely documented in the US.

Objectives: To estimate the prevalence of mistreatment by health care professionals during childbirth among a representative multistate sample and to identify patient characteristics associated with mistreatment experiences.

Design, Setting, And Participants: This cross-sectional study used representative survey data collected from respondents to the 2020 Pregnancy Risk and Monitoring System in 6 states and New York City who had a live birth in 2020 and participated in the Postpartum Assessment of Health Survey at 12 to 14 months' post partum. Data were collected from January 1, 2021, to March 31, 2022.

Exposures: Demographic, social, clinical, and birth characteristics that have been associated with patients' health care experiences.

Main Outcomes And Measures: Any mistreatment during childbirth, as measured by the Mistreatment by Care Providers in Childbirth scale, a validated measure of self-reported experiences of 8 types of mistreatment. Survey-weighted rates of any mistreatment and each mistreatment indicator were estimated, and survey-weighted logistic regression models estimated odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs.

Results: The sample included 4458 postpartum individuals representative of 552 045 people who had live births in 2020 in 7 jurisdictions. The mean (SD) age was 29.9 (5.7) years, 2556 (54.4%) identified as White, and 2836 (58.8%) were commercially insured. More than 1 in 8 individuals (13.4% [95% CI, 11.8%-15.1%]) reported experiencing mistreatment during childbirth. The most common type of mistreatment was being "ignored, refused request for help, or failed to respond in a timely manner" (7.6%; 95% CI, 6.5%-8.9%). Factors associated with experiencing mistreatment included being lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer identifying (unadjusted OR [UOR], 2.3; 95% CI, 1.4-3.8), Medicaid insured (UOR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.1-1.8), unmarried (UOR, 0.8; 95% CI, 0.6-1.0), or obese before pregnancy (UOR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.0-1.7); having an unplanned cesarean birth (UOR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.2-2.2), a history of substance use disorder (UOR, 2.6; 95% CI, 1.3-5.1), experienced intimate partner or family violence (UOR, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.3-4.2), mood disorder (UOR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.1-2.2), or giving birth during the COVID-19 public health emergency (UOR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.1-2.0). Associations of mistreatment with race and ethnicity, age, educational level, rural or urban geography, immigration status, and household income were ambiguous.

Conclusions And Relevance: This cross-sectional study of individuals who had a live birth in 2020 in 6 states and New York City found that mistreatment during childbirth was common. There is a need for patient-centered, multifaceted interventions to address structural health system factors associated with negative childbirth experiences.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11192180PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.4873DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

uor 95%
32
mistreatment childbirth
20
mistreatment
13
95%
11
childbirth
8
health care
8
characteristics associated
8
cross-sectional study
8
data collected
8
states york
8

Similar Publications

Objective: To develop an automatic segmentation model to delineate the adnexal masses and construct a machine learning model to differentiate between low malignant risk and intermediate-high malignant risk of adnexal masses based on ovarian-adnexal reporting and data system (O-RADS).

Methods: A total of 663 ultrasound images of adnexal mass were collected and divided into two sets according to experienced radiologists: a low malignant risk set (n = 446) and an intermediate-high malignant risk set (n = 217). Deep learning segmentation models were trained and selected to automatically segment adnexal masses.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: To determine the association of whole blood and other blood products (components, prothrombin complex concentrate, and fibrinogen concentrate) with the development of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) among blood recipients.

Design: Retrospective cohort study.

Setting: American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) database between 2020 and 2021.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: To explore the relationship between hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) and adverse pregnancy outcomes and explore the risk factors for HDP.

Methods: Data were obtained from the Maternal Near-Miss Surveillance System in Hunan Province, China, 2012-2022. Chi-square trend tests ( ) were used to determine trends in prevalence by year.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Intracranial findings associated with low odds of retinal hemorrhage among children under 2 years of age at a single pediatric trauma center.

Child Abuse Negl

December 2024

Dell Children's Trauma and Injury Research Center, United States of America; Department of Surgery and Perioperative Care, Dell Medical School at The University of Texas at Austin, United States of America.

Background: Evaluation by a pediatric ophthalmologist to look for retinal hemorrhages (RH) is often part of screening for occult injury among young children with intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) presenting to a trauma center. While important, this examination may lengthen the time a child and family remain at the hospital.

Objective: We sought to identify injury patterns associated with a low likelihood of RH, which may help streamline child abuse screening protocols for very young children with ICH.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • A systematic review was conducted to evaluate the relationship between elevated blood pressure and the risk of rebleeding in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage before securing the aneurysm.
  • The review analyzed data from 15 observational studies, but found mixed results regarding the impact of different systolic blood pressure thresholds on rebleeding risk.
  • Overall, the quality of evidence was rated very low, making it unclear whether high blood pressure increases the risk of rebleeding in these patients.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!