This note deals with epidemiological data interpretation supporting the linear no-threshold model, as opposed to emerging evidence of adaptive response and hormesis from molecular biology in vitro and animal models. Particularly, the US-Japan Radiation Effects Research Foundation's lifespan study of atomic bomb survivors is scrutinized. We stress the years-long lag of the data processing after data gathering and evolving statistical models and methodologies across publications. The necessity of cautious interpretation of radiation epidemiology results is emphasized.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/HP.0000000000001775 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!