AI Article Synopsis

  • - The study analyzes the effects of induction immunosuppression using basiliximab on 475 heart transplant recipients from 2003-2020, comparing outcomes between those who received basiliximab (BG) and those who did not (NBG).
  • - Results show that while basiliximab is linked to a lower rate of acute cellular rejection (ACR), it corresponds with higher instances of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) and cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV), with no significant difference in infections or cancer risk between the two groups.
  • - The findings suggest that although basiliximab is effective in reducing ACR, it may lead to increased mortality and other complications, warranting

Article Abstract

Background: The use of induction immunosuppression for heart transplantation (HT) is debated given the uncertain benefit and potential risks of infection and malignancy.

Methods: This is a retrospective single-center analysis of 475 consecutive HT recipients from 2003 to 2020 grouped by use of induction with basiliximab group (BG) and the no basiliximab group (NBG). Subgroup analysis by era compared pre-2016 standard-basiliximab (BX) induction and 2016-2020 with selective-BX use as part of a calcineurin-inhibitor-sparing regimen.

Results: When adjusted for confounders (sex, age, PRA, eGFR), the BG was less likely to have acute cellular rejection (ACR) (OR.42, p < .001), but had more antibody mediated rejection (AMR) (OR 11.7, p < .001) and more cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) (OR 3.8, p = .04). There was no difference between BG and NBG in the incidence of malignancies or infections. When stratified by era (pre-2016 vs. 2016-2020), ACR remained less common in the BG than the NBG (36% vs. 50%, p = .045) groups, while AMR remained more common (9.7 vs. 0% p = .005). There was no significant difference in conditional survival comparing pre-and post-2016 NBG (HR 2.20 (95% CI.75-6.43); however, both pre-2016 BG and post-2016 BG have significantly higher mortality (HR 2.37 [95% CI 1.02-5.50) and HR 2.69 (95% CI 1.08-6.71), p = .045 and.03, respectively].

Conclusion: Basiliximab reduces the incidence of ACR but increases the risk of AMR, CAV, and may be associated with increased mortality. Mechanistic studies are needed to describe a potential T-cell-escape mechanism with enhanced humoral immunity.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11129338PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ctr.15307DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

basiliximab group
8
heart transplant
4
transplant center
4
center experience
4
experience basiliximab
4
induction
4
basiliximab induction
4
induction strategies
4
strategies double
4
double edged
4

Similar Publications

Background: Belatacept is approved for the prophylaxis of organ rejection in Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-seropositive kidney transplant recipients and is associated with a risk of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD).

Methods: Data from the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network were used to examine patterns of belatacept use, describe patient characteristics, and estimate risk of PTLD in EBV-seropositive, kidney-only transplant recipients receiving belatacept- or calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-based immunosuppression as part of US Food and Drug Administration-mandated safety monitoring.

Results: During the study period (June 15, 2011-June 14, 2016), 94.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Each year the number of combined heart-liver transplants (HLT) increases, with two distinct patient populations proceeding down this pathway. The first are patients with congenital heart disease (CHD), most commonly single ventricle patients palliated with Fontan. The second group are those with long standing congestive hepatopathy, amyloidosis, hemochromatosis, or alcohol induced myopathies and liver disease.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Blood group incompatibility previously represented an obstacle to living related donor (LRD) options; desensitization modalities have expanded LRD options. ABO-incompatible kidney transplants have been successful in adults and pediatric liver transplants, but to date not yet in pediatric kidney transplants in South Africa.

Case Report: Patient X is a 5 year old male with end-stage kidney failure due to Posterior Urethral Valves, requiring peritoneal dialysis pre-transplant.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Induction therapy is a critical component of renal transplantation, aimed at reducing delayed graft function (DGF) and improving graft survival. This review assesses the impact of leading large national and international guidelines: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO), and European Renal Best Practice (ERBP) propositions, focusing on their applicability to high-risk groups, specifically, on Black patients and those with donor-specific antibodies (DSAs). While NICE guidelines provide a standardized approach favoring basiliximab, concerns arise regarding their suitability for high-risk patients, who may benefit more from potent lymphocyte-depleting agents.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

: Induction therapy with basiliximab is recommended in kidney transplant (KT) recipients with a low immunological risk (LIR) profile. Whether basiliximab is associated with a decreased risk of acute rejection (AR) and graft loss is controversial. : In our institution, LIR patients (absence of anti-HLA antibodies before KT) are inducted with basiliximab in case of living-donor KT, while deceased-donor KT recipients receive no induction.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!