Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Objective: Children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy (CP) are typically ambulant with high motor functioning levels but with gait asymmetry and a greater risk of instability and falling. Physiotherapy is considered the core part of CP rehabilitation due to the risk of neurosurgery and the side effects of drug interventions. Although growing evidence has looked at the effect of upper limb loading during walking in many populations, such interventions in children with CP remain unexplored yet. The purpose of this study was to investigate if loading the upper limbs with external weights could improve walking speed, trunk control, and balance in ambulatory children with hemiplegic CP.
Patients And Methods: The following outcome measures were recorded at baseline and six weeks after the intervention: gait speed [10-Meter Walk Test (10 MWT)], trunk control [Trunk Control Measurement Scale (TCMS)], and balance [Pediatric Balance Scale (PBS)]. Multiple 2 (groups) x 2 (time-points) mixed analysis of variance models (ANOVAs) were used for analysis.
Results: Both groups showed a significant improvement (p < 0.001) in 10 MWT, TCMS, and PBS scores post-intervention. However, the magnitude of change in the outcome measures was higher in the intervention group (10 MWT = 0.59 m/s, TCMS = 10.41, PBS = 9.35) compared to the control group (10 MWT = 0.37 m/s, TCMS = 6.43, PBS = 4.68).
Conclusions: This study demonstrated that although both control and intervention groups showed improvements in terms of gait speed, trunk control, and balance, the intervention group that had upper limb loading showed higher significant improvements. Clinicaltrial.gov ID: NCT05444387.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.26355/eurrev_202403_35715 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!