Objective: To demonstrate the efficacy of the double-bipolar method in a benign hysterectomy.
Design: Stepwise demonstration of the technique with a narrative video.
Setting: The double-bipolar method was first reported in 2011 [1] and is gaining popularity in Japan; however, its usefulness in robot-assisted hysterectomy is under-reported. When unexpected bleeding occurs during robot-assisted hysterectomy using a monopolar technique, corrective measures may be prolonged and often require changing forceps. The Maryland forceps have 4 functions, including incision, dissection, grasping, and coagulation, which enable rapid responses to bleeding and reduce forceps changes and cost. Previously, we reported the usefulness of the double-bipolar technique in other surgical procedures [2,3]. Herein, we present a case of robot-assisted hysterectomy using this technique at an urban general hospital, including detailed insights into its execution.
Interventions: A 45-year-old female patient presented to our hospital with painful menstrual bleeding. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed an 8-cm myoma in the posterior wall of the uterine cervix. Consequently, a robot-assisted hysterectomy was performed using right-handed Maryland forceps (Intuitive, Sunnyvale, CA) and the ForceTriad Energy Platform (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN) in the macro mode, with an output of 60 W. This configuration ensured a consistent electronic output, regardless of the electrical resistivity of the target tissues, facilitating precise incisions using a momentary high voltage [4]. The surgical duration was 60 minutes, and the estimated blood loss was 5 mL.
Conclusion: The highly versatile double-bipolar method uses one forceps for incision, dissection, coagulation, and grasping and is useful in gynecological surgery. VIDEO ABSTRACT.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2024.03.013 | DOI Listing |
BMC Surg
December 2024
Department of Phase I Clinical Research Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400016, China.
Background: A new era in minimally invasive surgery has been ushered in by Leonardo's robot surgical system, but the safety and effectiveness in cervical cancer is lake of evidence. This study aimed to compare the safety, effectiveness, and cost-effectiveness of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (RRH) and conventional laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (LRH) in patients with cervical cancer.
Methods: Patients with cervical cancer who had radical surgery at the first affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University between January 2017 and June 2022 were enrolled.
Background: The advantages and disadvantages of Robotic Laparoscopic Surgery (RLS) compared to other minimally invasive surgical approaches are debated in the literature.
Objective: To evaluate the learning curves (LC) and their assessment methods for Robotic Laparoscopic Surgery (RLS) and Laparoscopic Surgery (LPS) in gynaecologic procedures.
Materials And Methods: A systematic review of the literature was performed including the English language observational or interventional studies reporting the absolute number of procedures needed to achieve competency in RLS and LPS gynaecologic procedures, along with an objective and reproducible LC assessment method.
Asian J Endosc Surg
December 2024
Department of Gynecology, Yamanashi Central Hospital, Yamanashi, Japan.
Introduction: Due to the growing medical need for gynecologic robotic surgery, several robotic surgeries may be performed in a single day at high-volume centers. This study evaluated the safety of performing multiple robot-assisted hysterectomies (RAHs) per day by the same surgeon.
Methods: We reviewed the clinical data of patients who underwent robotic surgery from April 2018 to September 2024 at the Department of Gynecology, Yamanashi Central Hospital, and also examined the surgical type, order, and surgeon for each procedure.
Asian J Endosc Surg
December 2024
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kawasaki Medical School, Okayama, Japan.
Introduction: The three-arm approach is mainly selected, despite the multiple robotic arms in da Vinci Xi. This type of surgical setup may provide less autonomy to the console surgeon and result in greater dependence on the bedside surgical assistant. Therefore, the 4th arm is used instead of the assist port, which is why we developed "pure" robot simple hysterectomy (PRSH) as a novel surgical technique, in which all ports are operated by robotic arms.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Obstet Gynaecol Res
January 2025
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Aim: To compare the surgical and oncologic outcomes between patients with locally recurrent cervical cancer undergoing robotic-assisted salvage radical hysterectomy (RH) and those undergoing conventional open salvage RH, performed by a single surgeon.
Methods: This retrospective comparative observational study utilized data obtained from consecutive patients with locally recurrent cervical cancer, developed after definitive radiotherapy. These patients either underwent robot-assisted RH (robotic group) or conventional open RH (open group).
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!